Cited by 148Primate Behavior and EcologyEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Social cognition on the Internet: testing constraints on social network size

Open access
Dunbar, R. I. M.·2012·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

The social brain hypothesis (an explanation for the evolution of brain size in primates) predicts that humans typically cannot maintain more than 150 relationships at any one time. The constraint is partly cognitive (ultimately determined by some aspect of brain volume) and partly one of time. Friendships (but not necessarily kin relationships) are maintained by investing time in them, and failure to do so results in an inexorable deterioration in the quality of a relationship. The Internet, and in particular the rise of social networking sites (SNSs), raises the possibility that digital media might allow us to circumvent some or all of these constraints. This allows us to test the importance of these constraints in limiting human sociality. Although the recency of SNSs means that there have been relatively few studies, those that are available suggest that, in general, the ability to broadcast to many individuals at once, and the possibilities this provides in terms of continuously updating our understanding of network members’ behaviour and thoughts, do not allow larger networks to be maintained. This may be because only relatively weak quality relationships can be maintained without face-to-face interaction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2012.0121

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Curry, O., Roberts, S. B. G. & Dunbar, R. I. M. In press. Altruism in networks: evidence for a kin premium. Br. J. Psychol.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunbar, R. I. M.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Dunbar, R. I. M.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2012-08-05
Volume
367
Issue
1599
Pages
2192-2201
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2042206122
Cited by
148
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
social cognition, social network size, Dunbar's number, social brain hypothesis, social networking sites, online relationships, friendship maintenance, relationship quality, face-to-face interaction, human sociality, digital media
MeSH terms
Brain, Cognition, Emotions, Biological Evolution, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Organ Size, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Time Factors, Internet, Friends, Social Networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review