The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A generalized form of context-dependent psychophysiological interactions (gPPI): A comparison to standard approaches
Open accessAbstract
Functional MRI (fMRI) allows one to study task-related regional responses and task-dependent connectivity analysis using psychophysiological interaction (PPI) methods. The latter affords the additional opportunity to understand how brain regions interact in a task-dependent manner. The current implementation of PPI in Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM8) is configured primarily to assess connectivity differences between two task conditions, when in practice fMRI tasks frequently employ more than two conditions. Here we evaluate how a generalized form of context-dependent PPI (gPPI; http://www.nitrc.org/projects/gppi), which is configured to automatically accommodate more than two task conditions in the same PPI model by spanning the entire experimental space, compares to the standard implementation in SPM8. These comparisons are made using both simulations and an empirical dataset. In the simulated dataset, we compare the interaction beta estimates to their expected values and model fit using the Akaike information criterion (AIC). We found that interaction beta estimates in gPPI were robust to different simulated data models, were not different from the expected beta value, and had better model fits than when using standard PPI (sPPI) methods. In the empirical dataset, we compare the model fit of the gPPI approach to sPPI. We found that the gPPI approach improved model fit compared to sPPI. There were several regions that became non-significant with gPPI. These regions all showed significantly better model fits with gPPI. Also, there were several regions where task-dependent connectivity was only detected using gPPI methods, also with improved model fit. Regions that were detected with all methods had more similar model fits. These results suggest that gPPI may have greater sensitivity and specificity than standard implementation in SPM. This notion is tempered slightly as there is no gold standard; however, data simulations with a known outcome support our conclusions about gPPI. In sum, the generalized form of context-dependent PPI approach has increased flexibility of statistical modeling, and potentially improves model fit, specificity to true negative findings, and sensitivity to true positive findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“with amygdala dysfunction underlying psychopathology;59”
From Distinct and shared therapeutic neural mechanisms of mindfulness-based and social support stress reduction groups in adults with autism spectrum disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [59]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
ANew Look at the Statistical Model Identification
AKAlKE, H. (2011) · Cited by 4,177
Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging
Friston, K. J., Buechel, C., Fink, G. R., Morris, J., Rolls, E., & Dolan, R. J. (1997) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1997.0291 · Cited by 3,097
Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1
Boynton, G., Engel, S., Glover, G., & Heeger, D. (1996) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-13-04207.1996 · Cited by 2,522
Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Poline, J., Grasby, P. M., Williams, S., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Turner, R. (1995) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1995.1007 · Cited by 2,504
A Population-Average, Landmark- and Surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex
Van Essen, D. C. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.058 · Cited by 1,151
Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: A problem of significance
Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2886 · Cited by 864
Gitelman, D. R., Penny, W. D., Ashburner, J., & Friston, K. J. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00058-2 · Cited by 799
Characterizing evoked hemodynamics with fMRI.
Friston, K. J., Frith, C., Turner, R., & Frackowiak, R. (1995) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1995.1018 · Cited by 711
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,000
Representing Multiple Observed Actions in the Motor System
Cracco, E., Keysers, C., Clauwaert, A., & Braß, M. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy237 · Cited by 42
The neural networks underlying reappraisal of empathy for pain
Naor, N., Rohr, C. S., Schaare, H. L., Limbachia, C., Shamay‐Tsoory, S., & Okon‐Singer, H. (2020) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsaa094 · Cited by 42
Differential contributions of left-hemispheric language regions to basic semantic composition
Graessner, A., Zaccarella, E., & Hartwigsen, G. (2021) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-020-02196-2 · Cited by 43
Fryer, S. L., Roach, B. J., Ford, J. M., Donaldson, K. R., Calhoun, V. D., Pearlson, G. D., Kiehl, K. A., Srihari, V. H., McGlashan, T. H., Woods, S. W., et al. (2019) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbx198 · Cited by 40
An adversarial collaboration to critically evaluate theories of consciousness
Cogitate Consortium, Ferrante, O., Gorska-Klimowska, U., Henin, S., Hirschhorn, R., Khalaf, A., Lepauvre, A., Liu, L., Richter, D., Vidal, Y., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.06.23.546249 · Cited by 86
Zhang, J., Chen, S., Jiang, Q. Y., Dong, H., Zhao, Z., Du, X., & Dong, G. (2021) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.05.051 · Cited by 41
Boccia, M., Guariglia, C., Sabatini, U., & Nemmi, F. (2015) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-015-1021-z · Cited by 42
van Holst, R. J., Chase, H. W., & Clark, L. (2014) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.06.008 · Cited by 45
Vrana, A., Boendermaker, S. H., Stämpfli, P., Hänggi, J., Seifritz, E., Humphreys, B. K., & Meier, M. L. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142391 · Cited by 41
Ventral striatal hyperconnectivity during rewarded interference control in adolescents with ADHD
Ma, I., van Holstein, M., Mies, G. W., Mennes, M., Buitelaar, J. K., Cools, R., Cillessen, A. H. N., Krebs, R. M., & Scheres, A. (2016) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.05.021 · Cited by 42
Dogan, A., Morishima, Y., Heise, F., Tanner, C., Gibson, R., Wagner, A. F., & Tobler, P. N. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep33263 · Cited by 43
Lois, G., Gerchen, M. F., Kirsch, P., Kanske, P., Schönfelder, S., & Wessa, M. (2017) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/bdi.12512 · Cited by 40
Keller, M., Mendoza-Quiñones, R., Muñoz, A. C., Iglesias-Fuster, J., Virués, A. V., Zvyagintsev, M., Edgar, J., Zweerings, J., & Mathiak, K. (2021) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-022-03780-y · Cited by 36
Intranasal oxytocin modulates neural functional connectivity during human social interaction
Rilling, J. K., Chen, X., Chen, X., & Haroon, E. (2018) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.22740 · Cited by 40
Alcohol Expectancy and Cerebral Responses to Cue-Elicited Craving in Adult Nondependent Drinkers
Zhornitsky, S., Zhang, S., Ide, J. S., Chao, H. H., Wang, W., Le, T. M., Leeman, R. F., Bi, J., Krystal, J. H., & Li, C. R. (2018) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.11.012 · Cited by 40
fMRI study of cannabidiol-induced changes in attention control in treatment-resistant epilepsy
Allendorfer, J. B., Nenert, R. E., Bebin, E. M., Gaston, T. E., Grayson, L. E., Hernando, K. A., Houston, J. T., Hansen, B., & Szaflarski, J. P. (2019) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.04.008 · Cited by 39
Bolton, T. A. W., Freitas, L. G. A., Jochaut, D., Giraud, A., & Ville, D. V. D. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116571 · Cited by 42
Sambuco, N., Bradley, M. M., Herring, D. R., & Lang, P. J. (2020) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13522 · Cited by 39
Men and women differ in the neural basis of handwriting
Yang, Y., Tam, F., Graham, S. J., Sun, G., Li, J., Gu, C., Tao, R., Wang, N., Bi, H., & Zuo, Z. (2020) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24968 · Cited by 41
Guo, C., Moses‐Kolko, E. L., Phillips, M. L., Swain, J. E., & Hipwell, A. E. (2018) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-017-0516-x · Cited by 41
Impaired planning in P arkinson's disease is reflected by reduced brain activation and connectivity
Trujillo, J. P., Gerrits, N. J. H. M., Vriend, C., Berendse, H. W., van den Heuvel, O. A., & van der Werf, Y. D. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22873 · Cited by 40
van Schie, C. C., van Harmelen, A., Hauber, K., Boon, A. E., Crone, E. A., & Elzinga, B. M. (2017) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.1080/20008198.2016.1272788 · Cited by 38
Functional connectivity in the social brain across childhood and adolescence
McCormick, E. M., van Hoorn, J., Cohen, J. R., & Telzer, E. H. (2018) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsy064 · Cited by 42
Bitsch, F., Berger, P., Nagels, A., Falkenberg, I., & Straube, B. (2018) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sby132 · Cited by 41
Transforming brain signals related to value evaluation and self‐control into behavioral choices
Zha, R., Bu, J., Wei, Z., Han, L., Zhang, P., Ren, J., Li, J., Wang, Y., Yang, L., Vollstädt‐Klein, S., et al. (2018) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24379 · Cited by 44
Hammoud, M. Z., Peters, C., Hatfield, J. R. B., Gorka, S. M., Phan, K. L., Milad, M. R., & Rabinak, C. A. (2019) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-019-0416-6 · Cited by 40
Applications of dynamic functional connectivity to pain and its modulation
Necka, E. A., Lee, I., Kucyi, A., Cheng, J. C., Yu, Q., & Atlas, L. Y. (2019) · PAIN Reports · doi:10.1097/pr9.0000000000000752 · Cited by 44
DeCross, S. N., Sambrook, K., Sheridan, M. A., Tottenham, N., & McLaughlin, K. A. (2021) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.09.013 · Cited by 42
Harrison, T. M., Burggren, A. C., Small, G. W., & Bookheimer, S. Y. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23036 · Cited by 38
Age-Related Differences in Functional Connectivity During Cognitive Emotion Regulation
Allard, E. S., & Kensinger, E. A. (2014) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbu108 · Cited by 41
Mier, D. U., Eisenacher, S., Rausch, F., Englisch, S., Gerchen, M. F., Zamoscik, V., Meyer‐Lindenberg, A., Zink, M., & Kirsch, P. (2016) · European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s00406-016-0737-y · Cited by 38
Retrosplenial Cortex Indexes Stability beyond the Spatial Domain
Auger, S. D., & Maguire, E. A. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2602-17.2017 · Cited by 39
Longitudinal fMRI study of language recovery after a left hemispheric ischemic stroke
Nenert, R. E., Allendorfer, J. B., Martin, A. M., Banks, C., Vannest, J. J., Holland, S. K., Hart, K. W., Lindsell, C. J., & Szaflarski, J. P. (2018) · Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience · doi:10.3233/rnn-170767 · Cited by 39
I lie, why don't you: Neural mechanisms of individual differences in self‐serving lying
Yin, L., & Weber, B. (2018) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24432 · Cited by 42
Di, X., & Biswal, B. B. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00573 · Cited by 38
Chen, Y., Becker, B., Zhang, Y., Cui, H., Du, J. R., Wernicke, J., Montag, C., Kendrick, K. M., & Yao, S. (2020) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.08.003 · Cited by 39
Al‐Khalil, K., Vakamudi, K., Witkiewitz, K. A., & Claus, E. D. (2021) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.14614 · Cited by 41
Rütgen, M., Pletti, C., Tik, M., Kraus, C., Pfabigan, D. M., Sladky, R., Klöbl, M., Woletz, M., Vanicek, T., Windischberger, C., et al. (2019) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-019-0496-4 · Cited by 39
The neural basis of semantic cognition in Mandarin Chinese: A combined fMRI and TMS study
Zhang, Q., Wang, H., Luo, C., Zhang, J., Jin, Z., & Li, L. (2019) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24781 · Cited by 37
Szekely, A., Silton, R. L., Heller, W., Miller, G. A., & Mohanty, A. (2016) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsw137 · Cited by 40
Neural mechanisms of reward processing in adolescent irritability
Kryza‐Lacombe, M., Hernandez, B. N., Owen, C. E., Reynolds, R. C., Wakschlag, L. S., Dougherty, L. R., & Wiggins, J. L. (2021) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.22090 · Cited by 36
Pantazatos, S. P., Mclntosh, J. R., Saber, G. T., Sun, X., Doose, J., Faller, J., Lin, Y., Teves, J., Blankenship, A., Huffman, S. M., et al. (2023) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2023.05.007 · Cited by 36
Racial Discrimination, Neural Connectivity, and Epigenetic Aging Among Black Women
Elbasheir, A., Katrinli, S., Kearney, B. E., Lanius, R. A., Harnett, N., Carter, S. E., Ely, T., Bradley, B., Gillespie, C. F., Stevens, J. S., et al. (2024) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.16588 · Cited by 23
Comparison of whole-brain task-modulated functional connectivity methods for fMRI task connectomics
Masharipov, R. S., Knyazeva, I., Korotkov, A. D., Cherednichenko, D. V., & Kireev, M. V. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-024-07088-3 · Cited by 39
Bowman, C. R., & Dennis, N. A. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00961 · Cited by 37
Altered Prefrontal Cortex Function Marks Heightened Anxiety Risk in Children
Clauss, J. A., Benningfield, M. M., Rao, U., & Blackford, J. U. (2016) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2016.05.024 · Cited by 39
Koizumi, A., Zhan, M., Ban, H., Kida, I., Martino, F. D., Vaessen, M. J., de Gelder, B., & Amano, K. (2019) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0429-19.2019 · Cited by 34
Effects of distraction on taste-related neural processing: a cross-sectional fMRI study
Duif, I., Wegman, J., Mars, M., de Graaf, C., Smeets, P. A. M., & Aarts, E. (2020) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqaa032 · Cited by 36
Rudolph, K. D., Skymba, H. V., Modi, H. H., Davis, M. M., Sze, W. Y., Rosswurm, C. P., & Telzer, E. H. (2020) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.22022 · Cited by 39
The Neural Circuitry Underlying the “Rhythm Effect” in Stuttering
Frankford, S. A., Murray, E. S. H., Masapollo, M., Cai, S., Tourville, J. A., Nieto-Castañón, A., & Guenther, F. H. (2021) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2021_jslhr-20-00328 · Cited by 38
Xiong, B., Chen, C., Tian, Y., Zhang, S., Liu, C., Evans, T. M., Fernández, G., Wu, J., & Qin, S. (2021) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102127 · Cited by 38
Neural correlates of biased social fear learning and interaction in an intergroup context
Molapour, T., Golkar, A., Navarrete, C. D., Haaker, J., & Olsson, A. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.015 · Cited by 36
Economides, M., Guitart‐Masip, M., Kurth-Nelson, Z. L., & Dolan, R. J. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4313-13.2014 · Cited by 37
Non-invasive temporal interference electrical stimulation of the human hippocampusPreprint
Violante, I. R., Alania, K., Cassara, A. M., Neufeld, E., Acerbo, E., Carron, R., Williamson, A., Kurtin, D. L., Rhodes, E., Hampshire, A., et al. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.09.14.507625 · Cited by 36
Fear avoidance beliefs in back pain-free subjects are reflected by amygdala-cingulate responses
Meier, M. L., Stämpfli, P., Vrana, A., Humphreys, B. K., Seifritz, E., & Boendermaker, S. H. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00424 · Cited by 37
Error-related functional connectivity of the thalamus in cocaine dependence
Zhang, S., Hu, S., Bednarski, S. R., Erdman, E., & Li, C. R. (2014) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.01.015 · Cited by 37
Westphal, A. J., Reggente, N., Ito, K. L., & Rissman, J. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23074 · Cited by 36
Degrading traumatic memories with eye movements: a pilot functional MRI study in PTSD
Thomaes, K., Engelhard, I. M., Sijbrandij, M., Cath, D. C., & van den Heuvel, O. A. (2016) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.3402/ejpt.v7.31371 · Cited by 38
Di, X., Reynolds, R. C., & Biswal, B. B. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23413 · Cited by 35
Putamen functional connectivity during inhibitory control in smokers and non‐smokers
Akkermans, S. E. A., Luijten, M., van Rooij, D., Franken, I. H. A., & Buitelaar, J. K. (2016) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/adb.12482 · Cited by 36
Impact of FAAH genetic variation on fronto-amygdala function during emotional processing
Gärtner, A., Dörfel, D., Diers, K., Witt, S. H., Strobel, A., & Brocke, B. (2018) · European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s00406-018-0944-9 · Cited by 40
Pei, R., Lauharatanahirun, N., Cascio, C. N., O’Donnell, M. B., Shope, J. T., Simons‐Morton, B. G., Vettel, J. M., & Falk, E. B. (2020) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100794 · Cited by 46
Rudolph, K., Davis, M. M., Skymba, H. V., Modi, H. H., & Telzer, E. (2020) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100903 · Cited by 35
Martin, U., Adams, S. C., & Kiefer, M. (2014) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22566 · Cited by 35
Harding, I. H., Andrews, Z. B., Mata, F., Orlandea, S., Martínez-Zalacaín, I., Soriano-Mas, C., Stice, E., & Verdejo-Garcia, A. (2018) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2017.237 · Cited by 31
Liu, Q., Gao, F., Wang, X., Xia, J., Yuan, G., Zheng, S., Zhong, M., & Zhu, X. (2023) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.26457 · Cited by 33
The Yin and the Yang of Prediction: An fMRI Study of Semantic Predictive Processing
Weber, K., Lau, E. F., Stillerman, B. S., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148637 · Cited by 38
Langnes, E., Dídac Vidal-piñeiro, A., Sneve, M. H., Amlien, I. K., Walhovd, K. B., & Fjell, A. M. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy209 · Cited by 34
King, J. A., Bernardoni, F., Geisler, D., Ritschel, F., Doose, A., Pauligk, S., Pásztor, K., Weidner, K., Roessner, V., Smolka, M. N., et al. (2020) · Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1503/jpn.180252 · Cited by 38
Olfactory connectivity mediates sleep-dependent food choices in humans
Bhutani, S., Howard, J. D., Reynolds, R., Zee, P. C., Gottfried, J. A., & Kahnt, T. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.49053 · Cited by 34
Gorka, S. M., Teppen, T. L., Radoman, M., Phan, K. L., & Pandey, S. C. (2019) · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyz057 · Cited by 34
Fareri, D. S., Smith, D. V., & Delgado, M. R. (2020) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsaa031 · Cited by 36
Szaflarski, J. P., Nenert, R. E., Allendorfer, J. B., Martin, A. N., Amara, A. W., Griffis, J. C., Dietz, A. R., Mark, V. W., Sung, V., Walker, H. C., et al. (2021) · Medical Science Monitor · doi:10.12659/msm.931468 · Cited by 36
Zhuang, L., Wang, J., Xiong, B., Bian, C., Lei, H. C., Bayley, P. J., & Qin, S. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01188-4 · Cited by 38
Wackerhagen, C., Wüstenberg, T., Mohnke, S., Erk, S., Veer, I. M., Kruschwitz, J. D., Garbusow, M., Romund, L., Otto, K., Schweiger, J. I., et al. (2017) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2017.59 · Cited by 33
van Holst, R. J., van der Meer, J. N., McLaren, D. G., van den Brink, W., Veltman, D. J., & Goudriaan, A. E. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049923 · Cited by 35
Self-citationSpatial Attention, Motor Intention, and Bayesian Cue Predictability in the Human Brain
Kuhns, A. B., Dombert, P. L., Mengotti, P., Fink, G. R., & Vossel, S. (2017) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3255-16.2017 · Cited by 34
Subliminal and supraliminal processing of reward-related stimuli in anorexia nervosa
Boehm, I., King, J. A., Bernardoni, F., Geisler, D., Seidel, M., Ritschel, F., Goschke, T., Haynes, J., Roessner, V., & Ehrlich, S. (2017) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291717002161 · Cited by 34
Oxytocin reduces a chemosensory-induced stress bias in social perception
Maier, A., Scheele, D., Spengler, F. B., Menba, T., Mohr, F., Güntürkün, O., Stoffel‐Wagner, B., Kinfe, T. M., Maier, W., Khalsa, S. S., et al. (2018) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-018-0063-3 · Cited by 33
van Buuren, M., Walsh, R. J., Sijtsma, H., Hollarek, M., Lee, N. C., Bos, P. A., & Krabbendam, L. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117060 · Cited by 35
Kryza‐Lacombe, M., Pearson, N., Lyubomirsky, S., Stein, M. B., Wiggins, J. L., & Taylor, C. T. (2021) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2021.103860 · Cited by 35
Bloom, P. A., VanTieghem, M., Gabard-Durnam, L. J., Gee, D. G., Flannery, J., Caldera, C., Goff, B., Telzer, E. H., Humphreys, K. L., Fareri, D. S., et al. (2022) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.25847 · Cited by 34
Cardinale, E. M., Breeden, A. L., Robertson, E., Lozier, L. M., VanMeter, J. W., & Marsh, A. A. (2017) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579417000566 · Cited by 33
Basal forebrain moderates the magnitude of task-dependent amygdala functional connectivity
Gorka, A. X., Knodt, A. R., & Hariri, A. R. (2014) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsu080 · Cited by 35
Infante, M. A., Moore, E. M., Bischoff‐Grethe, A., Tapert, S. F., Mattson, S. N., & Riley, E. P. (2017) · Alcohol · doi:10.1016/j.alcohol.2017.05.002 · Cited by 33
Roberts, R. P., Hach, S., Tippett, L. J., & Addis, D. R. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.028 · Cited by 32
Neural correlates of altered feedback learning in women recovered from anorexia nervosa
Ritschel, F., Geisler, D., King, J. A., Bernardoni, F., Seidel, M., Boehm, I., Vettermann, R., Biemann, R., Roessner, V., Smolka, M. N., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-04761-y · Cited by 33
The dynamic contribution of the high‐level visual cortex to imagery and perception
Boccia, M., Sulpizio, V., Teghil, A., Palermo, L., Piccardi, L., Galati, G., & Guariglia, C. (2019) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24535 · Cited by 32
Separate Memory-Enhancing Effects of Reward and Strategic Encoding
Cohen, M. S., Cheng, L. Y., Paller, K. A., & Reber, P. J. (2019) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01438 · Cited by 36
Chrysikou, E. G., Wing, E. K., & van Dam, W. O. (2019) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.12.004 · Cited by 38
Parietal Cortex Integrates Saccade and Object Orientation Signals to Update Grasp Plans
Baltaretu, B. R., Monaco, S., Velji-Ibrahim, J., Luabeya, G. N., & Crawford, J. D. (2020) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0300-20.2020 · Cited by 33
Common and dissociable effects of oxytocin and lorazepam on the neurocircuitry of fear
Kreuder, A., Scheele, D., Schultz, J., Hennig, J., Marsh, N., Dellert, T., Ettinger, U., Philipsen, A., Babasiz, M., Herscheid, A., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1920147117 · Cited by 27
Masson, H. L., de Beeck, H. O., & Boets, B. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117009 · Cited by 32
Segregating attention from response control when performing a motor inhibition task
Meffert, H., Hwang, S., Nolan, Z. T., Chen, G., & Blair, J. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.029 · Cited by 33
Age-related changes in neural mechanisms of prospective memory
Lamichhane, B., McDaniel, M. A., Waldum, E. R., & Braver, T. S. (2018) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-018-0617-1 · Cited by 32
Young, K. S., LeBeau, R. T., Niles, A. N., Hsu, K. J., Burklund, L. J., Mesri, B., Saxbe, D., Lieberman, M. D., & Craske, M. G. (2019) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.016 · Cited by 30
“Non-responders were defined as those who did not achieve a reliable reduction in symptom level and/or did not move below the threshold for clinically-significant CSR. fMRI connectivity analyses Psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analyses were conducted to assess task-related changes in functional connectivity of le…”
Distinct Reward Properties are Encoded via Corticostriatal Interactions
Smith, D. V., Rigney, A. E., & Delgado, M. R. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep20093 · Cited by 34
Spatial working memory in neurofibromatosis 1: Altered neural activity and functional connectivity
Ibrahim, A. F. A., Montojo, C. A., Haut, K. M., Karlsgodt, K. H., Hansen, L., Congdon, E. L., Rosser, T. L., Bilder, R. M., Silva, A. J., & Bearden, C. E. (2017) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2017.06.032 · Cited by 31
Quidé, Y., O’Reilly, N., Watkeys, O. J., Carr, V. J., & Green, M. J. (2017) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291717002884 · Cited by 33
Ogawa, A., Ueshima, A., Inukai, K., & Kameda, T. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-31308-6 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- McLaren, D. G., Ries, M. L., Xu, G., & Johnson, S. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Johnson, Sterling C.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1277-1286
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3376181
- OpenAlex
- W2132137022
- Cited by
- 1,445
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 99 · 2025: 121 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 117 · 2021: 125 · 2020: 139 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 129 · 2017: 120 · 2016: 122 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 23.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Veterans Affairs Merit Review (I01CX000165)
- National Institutes of Health (AG021155, AG000213)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- generalized psychophysiological interaction, functional MRI, statistical parametric mapping, model fit, Akaike information criterion, brain connectivity
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Neurological, Psychophysiology, Sensitivity and Specificity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
