Cited by 114Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismReading and Literacy DevelopmentLanguage Development and Disorders

When Elephants Fly: Differential Sensitivity of Right and Left Inferior Frontal Gyri to Discourse and World Knowledge

Open access
Menenti, Laura, Petersson, Karl Magnus, Scheeringa, René, Hagoort, Peter·2009·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Both local discourse and world knowledge are known to influence sentence processing. We investigated how these two sources of information conspire in language comprehension. Two types of critical sentences, correct and world knowledge anomalies, were preceded by either a neutral or a local context. The latter made the world knowledge anomalies more acceptable or plausible. We predicted that the effect of world knowledge anomalies would be weaker for the local context. World knowledge effects have previously been observed in the left inferior frontal region (Brodmann's area 45/47). In the current study, an effect of world knowledge was present in this region in the neutral context. We also observed an effect in the right inferior frontal gyrus, which was more sensitive to the discourse manipulation than the left inferior frontal gyrus. In addition, the left angular gyrus reacted strongly to the degree of discourse coherence between the context and critical sentence. Overall, both world knowledge and the discourse context affect the process of meaning unification, but do so by recruiting partly different sets of brain areas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.2008.21163

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Menenti, L., Petersson, K. M., Scheeringa, R., & Hagoort, P.
Affiliations
  • Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (NL)
  • Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (NL)
  • 1Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2009-12-01
Volume
21
Issue
12
Pages
2358-2368
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2137351172
Cited by
114
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
world knowledge, discourse context, sentence processing, language comprehension, inferior frontal gyrus, angular gyrus, hemispheric lateralization, discourse coherence
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Language, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Psycholinguistics, Knowledge, Comprehension, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review