Cited by 35Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Characterization of sustained BOLD activation in the rat barrel cortex and neurochemical consequences

Open access
Just, Nathalie, Xin, Lijing, Frenkel, Hanne, Gruetter, Rolf·2013·NeuroImage

Abstract

To date, only a couple of functional MR spectroscopy (fMRS) studies were conducted in rats. Due to the low temporal resolution of (1)H MRS techniques, prolonged stimulation paradigms are necessary for investigating the metabolic outcome in the rat brain during functional challenge. However, sustained activation of cortical areas is usually difficult to obtain due to neural adaptation. Anesthesia, habituation, high variability of the basal state metabolite concentrations as well as low concentrations of the metabolites of interest such as lactate (Lac), glucose (Glc) or γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and small expected changes of metabolite concentrations need to be addressed. In the present study, the rat barrel cortex was reliably and reproducibly activated through sustained trigeminal nerve (TGN) stimulation. In addition, TGN stimulation induced significant positive changes in lactate (+1.01 μmol/g, p<0.008) and glutamate (+0.92 μmol/g, p<0.02) and significant negative aspartate changes (-0.63 μmol/g, p<0.004) using functional (1)H MRS at 9.4 T in agreement with previous changes observed in human fMRS studies. Finally, for the first time, the dynamics of lactate, glucose, aspartate and glutamate concentrations during sustained somatosensory activation in rats using fMRS were assessed. These results allow demonstrating the feasibility of fMRS measurements during prolonged barrel cortex activation in rats.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.042

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prolonged (i.e., minutes) stimulations elicit a persistent BOLD response with minimal attenuation in humans and rats.

    “Nonetheless, results in both humans (Mangia et al., 2007b) and rats (Just et al., 2013) have shown that prolonged (i.e., minutes) stimulations elicit a persistent BOLD response with minimal attenuation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bandettini, P.A., Kwong, K.K., Davis, T.L., Tootell, R.B., Wong, E.C., Fox, P.T., Belliveau, J.W., Weisskoff, R.M., Rosen, B.R., 1997. Characterization of cerebral blood oxygenation and flow changes during prolonged brain activation. Hum. Brain Mapp. 5 (2), 93-109.
  2. Woolsey, T.A., Van der Loos, H., 1970. The structural organization of layer IV in the so- matosensory region (SI) of mouse cerebral cortex. The description of a cortical field composed of discrete cytoarchitectonic units. Brain Res. 17 (2), 205-242.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Just, N., Xin, L., Frenkel, H., & Gruetter, R.
Affiliations
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Just, Nathalie
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
74
Pages
343-351
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163130791
Cited by
35
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Centre d'Imagerie BioMédicale (CIBM) of Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)
  • University of Lausanne (UNIL)
  • Foundations Leenards et Jeantet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
barrel cortex, trigeminal nerve stimulation, lactate, glutamate, aspartic acid, glucose, brain metabolites, neural adaptation, rat brain
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Electric Stimulation, Male, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Somatosensory Cortex, Trigeminal Nerve, Vibrissae, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review