The DOI matches its Crossref record; 147 of the 149 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Therapeutic effects of non-invasive brain stimulation with direct currents (tDCS) in neuropsychiatric diseases
Abstract
Neuroplasticity, which is the dynamic structural and functional reorganization of central nervous system connectivity due to environmental and internal demands, is recognized as a major physiological basis for adaption of cognition, and behavior, and thus of utmost importance for normal brain function. Pathological alterations of plasticity are increasingly explored as pathophysiological foundation of diverse neurological and psychiatric diseases. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques (NIBS), such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), are able to induce and modulate neuroplasticity in humans. Therefore, they have potential to alter pathological plasticity on the one hand, and foster physiological plasticity on the other, in neuropsychiatric diseases to reduce symptoms, and enhance rehabilitation. tDCS is an emerging NIBS tool, which induces glutamatergic plasticity via application of relatively weak currents through the scalp in humans. In the last years its efficacy to treat neuropsychiatric diseases has been explored increasingly. In this review, we will give an overview of pathological alterations of plasticity in neuropsychiatric diseases, gather clinical studies involving tDCS to ameliorate symptoms, and discuss future directions of application, with an emphasis on optimizing stimulation effects.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Cognitive training effects with tDCS in other disorders and healthy subjects have been shown to last up to 6 months (Boggio et al., 2012; Kuo et al., 2014) and even 1 year (Katz et al., 2017).”
From Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Its Clinical Translation (2018) · cites this paper as Kuo et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“Moreover, our stimulation method did not follow the usual tDCS protocols for the treatment of clinical symptoms during daytime as reviewed by [48,49]: a) in comparison to most other studies, we applied DC only in one single stimulation session; b) the applied current strength in our study was significantly lower than in other studies (0.25 mA vs. 1e2 mA); and c) DC stimulation in our study was not”
Citations
Cites
Hebb, D. O. (2005) · doi:10.4324/9781410612403 · Cited by 9,825
Bliss, T. V. P., & Gardner-Medwin, A. R. (1973) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010274 · Cited by 7,424
indicated, N. A. (1950) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0049612 · Cited by 6,984
Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2000) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x · Cited by 5,656
Koob, G. F., & Volkow, N. D. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.110 · Cited by 5,340
Malenka, R. C., & Bear, M. F. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.012 · Cited by 3,968
Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008
Nitsche, M. A., Cohen, L. G., Wassermann, E. M., Priori, A., Lang, N., Antal, A., Paulus, W., Hummel, F., Boggio, P. S., Fregni, F., et al. (2008) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004 · Cited by 3,057
Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans
Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.57.10.1899 · Cited by 2,617
Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective
Bechara, A. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1584 · Cited by 2,149
Abnormal neural oscillations and synchrony in schizophrenia
Uhlhaas, P. J., & Singer, W. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2774 · Cited by 2,120
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dedoncker, J., Brunoni, A. R., Baeken, C., & Vanderhasselt, M. (2016) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2016.04.006 · Cited by 555
“Nonetheless, although some studies showed that tDCS over the DLPFC is able to improve cognitive performance in both healthy and neuropsychiatric samples [10,11], recent meta-analyses revealed that the results are mixed – e.”
Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation for understanding brain function
Filmer, H. L., Dux, P. E., & Mattingley, J. B. (2014) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2014.08.003 · Cited by 539
“variety of psychiatric and neurological conditions [3, 4], including depression [3, 5], stroke [4], and altered states of consciousness [6].”
Coffman, B. A., Clark, V. P., & Parasuraman, R. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.083 · Cited by 466
“Lang et al. (2003) suggested that the effect of tDCS on motor sequence learning is primarily related to its effects on consolidation (the stabilization of amemory trace after acquisition), as opposed to acquisition (the initial attainment) of motor memories. In a similar study, Reis et al. (2009) examined the specific…”
Hill, A. T., Fitzgerald, P. B., & Hoy, K. E. (2015) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2015.10.006 · Cited by 446
“Importantly, the effects of tDCS have been shown to persist for over an hour beyond the period of stimulation [28,30].”
Origins of specificity during tDCS: anatomical, activity-selective, and input-bias mechanisms
Bikson, M., Name, A., & Rahman, A. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00688 · Cited by 407
“Generally, any interaction between brain activity and the efficacy of tDCS modulation (Kim and Ko, 2013; Pirulli et al., 2013) suggests “tDCS can be highly focal when guided by a behavioral task” (Lapenta et al., 2013).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuo, M.-F., Paulus, W., & Nitsche, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Nitsche, Michael A.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 85
- Pages
- 948-960
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057070604
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 149
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 31
- FWCI
- 4.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- GRO (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- German Research Society (Ni 683/4-2, Ni 683/6-1)
- German Ministry for Education and Research (03IPT605E)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
- Keywords
- transcranial direct current stimulation, non-invasive brain stimulation, neuroplasticity, neuropsychiatric disorders, stimulation optimization
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Tinnitus, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
