The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring MEG closer to the brain: Performance of on-scalp sensor arrays
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Optically-pumped magnetometers (OPMs) have recently reached sensitivity levels required for magnetoencephalography (MEG). OPMs do not need cryogenics and can thus be placed within millimetres from the scalp into an array that adapts to the individual head size and shape, thereby reducing the distance from cortical sources to the sensors. Here, we quantified the improvement in recording MEG with hypothetical on-scalp OPM arrays compared to a 306-channel state-of-the-art SQUID array (102 magnetometers and 204 planar gradiometers). We simulated OPM arrays that measured either normal (nOPM; 102 sensors), tangential (tOPM; 204 sensors), or all components (aOPM; 306 sensors) of the magnetic field. We built forward models based on magnetic resonance images of 10 adult heads; we employed a three-compartment boundary element model and distributed current dipoles evenly across the cortical mantle. Compared to the SQUID magnetometers, nOPM and tOPM yielded 7.5 and 5.3 times higher signal power, while the correlations between the field patterns of source dipoles were reduced by factors of 2.8 and 3.6, respectively. Values of the field-pattern correlations were similar across nOPM, tOPM and SQUID gradiometers. Volume currents reduced the signals of primary currents on average by 10%, 72% and 15% in nOPM, tOPM and SQUID magnetometers, respectively. The information capacities of the OPM arrays were clearly higher than that of the SQUID array. The dipole-localization accuracies of the arrays were similar while the minimum-norm-based point-spread functions were on average 2.4 and 2.5 times more spread for the SQUID array compared to nOPM and tOPM arrays, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Increased proximity to the scalp can improve sensitivity and spatial resolution beyond that which is achieved using a cryogenic MEG [26,27].”
From Naturalistic Hyperscanning with Wearable Magnetoencephalography (2023) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x · Cited by 50,387
Cortical Surface-Based Analysis
Dale, A. M., Fischl, B., & Sereno, M. I. (1999) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1998.0395 · Cited by 10,910 · cited 1×
“FreeSurfer software (Dale et al., 1999; Fischl et al., 1999a; Fischl, 2012) was used to segment the cortical mantles from individual MRIs.”
Fischl, B. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021 · Cited by 9,526 · cited 1×
“FreeSurfer software (Dale et al., 1999; Fischl et al., 1999a; Fischl, 2012) was used to segment the cortical mantles from individual MRIs.”
Cortical Surface-Based Analysis
Fischl, B., Sereno, M. I., & Dale, A. M. (1999) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1998.0396 · Cited by 6,147 · cited 2×
“FreeSurfer software (Dale et al., 1999; Fischl et al., 1999a; Fischl, 2012) was used to segment the cortical mantles from individual MRIs.”
Hämäläinen, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Knuutila, J., & Lounasmaa, O. V. (1993) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.65.413 · Cited by 4,684 · cited 2×
“2.3 Minimum-norm estimate Minimum-l2-norm estimator (Dale and Sereno, 1993; Hämäläinen and Ilmoniemi, 1994) can be used to estimate underlying sources from measured data.”
InfluentialA hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI
Ségonne, F., Dale, A. M., Busa, E., Glessner, M., Salat, D. H., Hahn, H., & Fischl, B. R. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.032 · Cited by 2,227 · cited 2×
“For each subject, we used the watershed algorithm (Ségonne et al., 2004) implemented in FreeSurfer and MNE software (Gramfort et al., 2014) to segment the brain, skull and scalp compartments.”
MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data
Gramfort, A., Luessi, M., Larson, E., Engemann, D. A., Strohmeier, D., Brodbeck, C. J., Parkkonen, L. T., & Hämäläinen, M. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.027 · Cited by 2,035 · cited 1×
“, 2004) implemented in FreeSurfer and MNE software (Gramfort et al., 2014) to segment the brain, skull and scalp compartments.”
Self-citationDale, A. M., & Sereno, M. I. (1993) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.162 · Cited by 2,003 · cited 2×
“2.3 Minimum-norm estimate Minimum-l2-norm estimator (Dale and Sereno, 1993; Hämäläinen and Ilmoniemi, 1994) can be used to estimate underlying sources from measured data.”
InfluentialInterpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates
Hämäläinen, M. S., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (1994) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/bf02512476 · Cited by 1,995 · cited 2×
“2.3 Minimum-norm estimate Minimum-l2-norm estimator (Dale and Sereno, 1993; Hämäläinen and Ilmoniemi, 1994) can be used to estimate underlying sources from measured data.”
InfluentialBudker, D., & Romalis, M. V. (2007) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys566 · Cited by 1,923 · cited 1×
“Alternative sensors such as optically-pumped, or atomic, magnetometers (OPMs) (Budker and Kimball, 2013; Budker and Romalis, 2007) and high-Tc SQUIDs (Öisjöen et al., 2012) have recently reached sensitivities required for detecting neuromagnetic fields.”
Gross, K. S., Brandner, D. D., Martinez, L. A., Olive, M. F., Meisel, R. L., & Mermelstein, P. G. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162755 · Cited by 1,610
High-Sensitivity Atomic Magnetometer Unaffected by Spin-Exchange Relaxation
Allred, J. C., Lyman, R. N., Kornack, T. W., & Romalis, M. V. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.130801 · Cited by 1,049 · cited 2×
“Particularly OPMs operating in the spin-exchange relaxation-free (SERF) regime (Allred et al., 2002) could become a feasible, noncryogenic alternative to SQUIDs for neuromagnetic measurements as the combined dimensions and sensitivies of the SERF-OPMs are approaching those of SQUIDs (∼4–6 cm(2) and ∼3 − 5 fT/ Hz ).”
Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG
Schoffelen, J., & Groß, J. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20745 · Cited by 889
EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods
Mosher, J. C., Leahy, R. M., & Lewis, P. S. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.748978 · Cited by 845 · cited 1×
“We also compared the topographies obtained with a linear collocation (LC) (De Munck, 1992) and LG BEM (Mosher et al., 1999) across the subjects.”
Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems
Plonsey, R., & Heppner, D. B. (1967) · Bulletin of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/bf02476917 · Cited by 623 · cited 2×
“2.1 Physics When bioelectromagnetic fields are modeled in the macroscopic scale, the time-dependent terms in Maxwell’s equations can be omitted (Plonsey and Heppner, 1967).”
InfluentialA sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG
Huang, M., Mosher, J. C., & Leahy, R. M. (1999) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/44/2/010 · Cited by 615 · cited 1×
“The authors computed the magnetic field with local-spheres head model (Huang et al., 1999) in a single head geometry.”
Lin, F., Witzel, T., Ahlfors, S. P., Stufflebeam, S. M., Belliveau, J. W., & Hämäläinen, M. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.054 · Cited by 506
A common formalism for the Integral formulations of the forward EEG problem
Kybic, J., Clerc, M., Abboud, T., Faugeras, O. D., Keriven, R., & Papadopoulo, T. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2004.837363 · Cited by 424 · cited 2×
“Thus, the field computation for normal-component-measuring OPMs could potentially be done with a LC BEM, which is computationally lighter than the more accurate solvers such as LG BEM or symmetric BEM (Kybic et al., 2005).”
Microfabricated alkali atom vapor cells
Liew, L., Knappe, S. A., Moreland, J., Robinson, H. G., Hollberg, L. W., & Kitching, J. E. (2004) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.1691490 · Cited by 373 · cited 2×
“Thus, compared to the state-of-the-art OPMs, our hypothetical OPMs are optimistic in design; however, we anticipate that the distance between the vapor cell and the outer surface of the sensor will shrink in the next generation OPMs due to advances in sensor packaging and in the utilization of microfabrication (Liew e…”
Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy
Liu, A. K., Dale, A. M., & Belliveau, J. W. (2002) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.10024 · Cited by 348 · cited 1×
“To evaluate the differences between the arrays in linear distributedsource estimation, we used metrics derived from the resolution matrix (Hauk et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2002; Molins et al., 2008; de Peralta Menendez et al., 1997; Stenroos and Hauk, 2013).”
A compact, high performance atomic magnetometer for biomedical applications
Shah, V. K., & Wakai, R. T. (2013) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/58/22/8153 · Cited by 322 · cited 2×
“We assumed a noise level of 6 fT/ for the OPM sensor based on the work by Shah and Wakai (2013) who reported such a field resolution for their sensor in optimal conditions.”
Geselowitz, D. A. (1970) · IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · doi:10.1109/tmag.1970.1066765 · Cited by 317 · cited 1×
“When the conducting region is modeled to consist of piecewise homogeneous regions, the magnetic field is given by the Geselowitz formula; (Geselowitz, 1970) where Bp(r) and Bv(r) are the magnetic fields due to primary and volume currents, μ0 is the permeability of free space, and , and are the…”
A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG
Vorwerk, J., Cho, J., Rampp, S., Hamer, H. M., Knösche, T. R., & Wolters, C. H. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.040 · Cited by 307 · cited 1×
“The effect of common volume-conductor-model errors and simplifications on both nOPM and tOPM could be assessed by comparing geometrically correct and erroneous simplified models to more detailed reference models (Stenroos et al., 2014; Stenroos and Nummenmaa, 2016; Vorwerk et al., 2014).”
Distributed current estimates using cortical orientation constraints
Lin, F., Belliveau, J. W., Dale, A. M., & Hämäläinen, M. (2005) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20155 · Cited by 291 · cited 3×
“The regularization parameter has been suggested to be chosen as (Lin et al., 2006a,b) where Nc is the number of sensors, SNR is the estimated signal-to-noise ratio, tr(·) is trace of a matrix and L is the whitened lead-field matrix: .”
(2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511846380 · Cited by 286
Goldenholz, D. M., Ahlfors, S. P., Hämäläinen, M., Sharon, D., Ishitobi, M., Vaina, L. M., & Stufflebeam, S. M. (2008) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20571 · Cited by 266 · cited 3×
“For each subject, we used the watershed algorithm (Ségonne et al., 2004) implemented in FreeSurfer and MNE software (Gramfort et al., 2014) to segment the brain, skull and scalp compartments.”
Magnetoencephalography with a two-color pump-probe, fiber-coupled atomic magnetometer
Johnson, C., Schwindt, P. D. D., & Weisend, M. P. (2010) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.3522648 · Cited by 210
de Munck, J. C. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.256433 · Cited by 194 · cited 1×
“We also compared the topographies obtained with a linear collocation (LC) (De Munck, 1992) and LG BEM (Mosher et al., 1999) across the subjects.”
On the Potential of a New Generation of Magnetometers for MEG: A Beamformer Simulation Study
Boto, E., Bowtell, R., Krüger, P., Fromhold, T. M., Morris, P. G., Meyer, S. S., Barnes, G. R., & Brookes, M. J. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157655 · Cited by 194
Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum ℓ2-norm estimation
Molins, A., Stufflebeam, S. M., Brown, E. N., & Hämäläinen, M. S. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.064 · Cited by 192 · cited 2×
“To evaluate the differences between the arrays in linear distributed-source estimation, we used metrics derived from the resolution matrix (Hauk et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2002; Molins et al., 2008; de Peralta Menendez et al., 1997; Stenroos and Hauk, 2013).”
Hauk, O., Wakeman, D. G., & Henson, R. N. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.053 · Cited by 191 · cited 1×
“To evaluate the differences between the arrays in linear distributed-source estimation, we used metrics derived from the resolution matrix (Hauk et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2002; Molins et al., 2008; de Peralta Menendez et al., 1997; Stenroos and Hauk, 2013).”
Alem, O., Sander, T. H., Mhaskar, R. R., LeBlanc, J., Eswaran, H., Steinhoff, U., Okada, Y. C., Kitching, J. E., Trahms, L., & Knappe, S. A. (2015) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/60/12/4797 · Cited by 185
A low-power, high-sensitivity micromachined optical magnetometer
Mhaskar, R. R., Knappe, S. A., & Kitching, J. E. (2012) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.4770361 · Cited by 175
Comparison of three-shell and simplified volume conductor models in magnetoencephalography
Stenroos, M., Hunold, A., & Haueisen, J. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.006 · Cited by 123
Self-citationStenroos, M., Mäntynen, V., & Nenonen, J. (2007) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.09.004 · Cited by 122
Self-citationA random dipole model for spontaneous brain activity
de Munck, J. C., Vijn, P. C. M., & da Silva, F. H. L. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.148387 · Cited by 103 · cited 1×
“In addition, we investigated the overlap of the sensor lead fields as a function of the sensor distance (de Munck et al., 1992): for each sensor in the array, we calculated the distances and lead-field correlations between that sensor and all other sensors in the array.”
Bioelectromagnetic forward problem: isolated source approach revis(it)ed
Stenroos, M., & Sarvas, J. (2012) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/57/11/3517 · Cited by 92 · cited 2×
“For each subject, the lead-field matrix L was computed using a linear Galerkin BEM formulated with Isolated Source Approach (ISA) (Stenroos and Sarvas, 2012).”
InfluentialSelf-citationÖisjöen, F., Schneiderman, J. F., Figueras, G. A., Chukharkin, M. L., Kalabukhov, A., Hedström, A., Elam, M., & Winkler, D. (2012) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.3698152 · Cited by 69 · cited 7×
“The aim of this study was to assess the possible benefits of on-scalp MEG arrays that can be constructed using novel magnetic field sensors, e.g., optically-pumped magnetometers (OPMs) or high-Tc SQUIDs.”
InfluentialStenroos, M., & Nummenmaa, A. R. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159595 · Cited by 68 · cited 1×
“The effect of common volume-conductor-model errors and simplifications on both nOPM and tOPM could be assessed by comparing geometrically correct and erroneous simplified models to more detailed reference models (Stenroos et al., 2014; Stenroos and Nummenmaa, 2016; Vorwerk et al., 2014).”
Self-citationStenroos, M., & Hauk, O. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.086 · Cited by 62 · cited 2×
“To evaluate the differences between the arrays in linear distributed-source estimation, we used metrics derived from the resolution matrix (Hauk et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2002; Molins et al., 2008; de Peralta Menendez et al., 1997; Stenroos and Hauk, 2013).”
Self-citationSchneiderman, J. F. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.007 · Cited by 56 · cited 1×
“Previously, the performance of various MEG arrays has been assessed by computing the total information Itot conveyed by the array (Kemppainen and Ilmoniemi, 1989; Nenonen et al., 2004; Schneiderman, 2014).”
Channel Capacity of Multichannel Magnetometers
Kemppainen, P., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (1989) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0581-1_141 · Cited by 37 · cited 3×
“To complete forward model -based metrics and quantify the performance of the array with a single number, we calculated the total information conveyed by the array (Kemppainen and Ilmoniemi, 1989).”
Sensory mapping in a congenitally deaf subject: MEG and fRMI studies of cross-modal non-plasticity
Hickok, G. S., Poeppel, D., Clark, K., Buxton, R. B., Rowley, H. A., & Roberts, T. P. L. (1997) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1997)5:6 · Cited by 32
Information Content in Single-Component Versus Three-Component Cardiomagnetic Fields
Arturi, C. M., Rienzo, L. D., & Haueisen, J. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · doi:10.1109/tmag.2004.824891 · Cited by 26 · cited 1×
“Similar observations have been made for cardiomagnetic fields (Arturi et al., 2004).”
Radial and tangential components of dipolar sources and their magnetic fields
de Munck, J. C., & Daffertshofer, A. (2012) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2012.01.001 · Cited by 3 · cited 1×
“…indicate that the normal and tangential components carry independent information as the information capacity of the aOPM is higher than the information capacities of its sub-arrays nOPM and tOPM, indicating that these measurements are not redundant; see also de Munck and Daffertshofer (2012).”
High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface
Fischl, B., Sereno, M. I., Tootell, R. B. H., & Dale, A. M. (1999) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1999)8:4
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Nenonen, J., Kajola, M., Simola, J., Ahonen, A., 2004. Total information of multichannel MEG sensor arrays. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Biomagnetism, Biomag, pp. 630–631.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brookes, M. J., Leggett, J., Rea, M., Hill, R. M., Holmes, N., Boto, E., & Bowtell, R. W. (2022) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2022.05.008 · Cited by 438
“Simulations [12,13] show that this effect provides a four- to fivefold signal enhancement in many cortical areas.”
BackgroundOptically pumped magnetometers: from quantum origins to multi-channel magnetoencephalography
Tierney, T. M., Holmes, N., Mellor, S., López, J. D., Roberts, G., Hill, R. M., Boto, E., Leggett, J., Shah, V., Brookes, M. J., et al. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.063 · Cited by 400
“…advances in sensors, additional neuroscientific motivation for OPMs came from simulation studies examining issues such as improvements in SNR, spatial resolution and the requirements necessary for accurate source reconstruction (Boto et al., 2016a; Iivanainen et al., 2017a; Zetter et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMulti-Channel Whole-Head OPM-MEG: Helmet Design and a Comparison with a Conventional System
Hill, R. M., Boto, E., Rea, M., Holmes, N., Leggett, J., Coles, L. A., Papastavrou, M., Everton, S. K., Hunt, B. A. E., Sims, D., et al. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116995 · Cited by 285
Ultrasensitive Magnetic Field Sensors for Biomedical Applications
Murzin, D., Mapps, D. J., Levada, K., Belyaev, V., Omelyanchik, A., Panina, L., & Rodionova, V. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20061569 · Cited by 277
On-scalp MEG system utilizing an actively shielded array of optically-pumped magnetometers
Iivanainen, J., Zetter, R., Grön, M., Hakkarainen, K., & Parkkonen, L. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.022 · Cited by 269
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Iivanainen, J., Stenroos, M., & Parkkonen, L.
- Affiliations
- Aalto University (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Iivanainen, Joonas
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 147
- Pages
- 542-553
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5432137
- OpenAlex
- W2949327983
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7
- FWCI
- 7.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
- Seventh Framework Programme (600730)
- National Institutes of Health (R01NS094604)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Keywords
- magnetoencephalography, optically pumped magnetometers, SQUID magnetometer, planar gradiometer, forward modeling, boundary element model, dipole source localization, point spread function, information capacity, volume currents, signal-to-noise ratio
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Theoretical, Scalp, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetoencephalography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review