Cited by 286Embodied and Extended CognitionPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceFree Will and Agency

Specifying the self for cognitive neuroscience

Open access
Christoff, Kalina, Cosmelli, Diego, Legrand, Dorothée, Thompson, Evan·2011·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Cognitive neuroscience investigations of self-experience have mainly focused on the mental attribution of features to the self (self-related processing). In this paper, we highlight another fundamental, yet neglected, aspect of self-experience, that of being an agent. We propose that this aspect of self-experience depends on self-specifying processes, ones that implicitly specify the self by implementing a functional self/non-self distinction in perception, action, cognition and emotion. We describe two paradigmatic cases - sensorimotor integration and homeostatic regulation - and use the principles from these cases to show how cognitive control, including emotion regulation, is also self-specifying. We argue that externally directed, attention-demanding tasks, rather than suppressing self-experience, give rise to the self-experience of being a cognitive-affective agent. We conclude with directions for experimental work based on our framework.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.001

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent theories suggest that the rostral ACC may be a node for more implicit emotion regulation, especially when not co-activated with aspects of the dorsal attention network.

    “Recent theories suggest that the rostral ACC may be a node for more implicit emotion regulation, especially when not co-activated with aspects of the dorsal attention network (i.e., DLPFC, dorsal ACC; Christoff et al., 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christoff, K., Cosmelli, D., Legrand, D., & Thompson, E.
Affiliations
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
  • École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées (FR)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Thompson, Evan
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
104-112
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021926028
Cited by
286
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (81188_1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
self-experience, agency, sensorimotor integration, homeostatic regulation, cognitive control, emotion regulation, attention, self-referential processing
MeSH terms
Attention, Cognition, Humans, Neurosciences, Perception, Self-Assessment, Feedback, Sensory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review