CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 977Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reward-Motivated Learning: Mesolimbic Activation Precedes Memory Formation

Open access
Adcock, R. Alison, Thangavel, Arul, Whitfield-Gabrieli, Susan, Knutson, Brian, Gabrieli, John D.E.·2006·Neuron
DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.036
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We examined anticipatory mechanisms of reward-motivated memory formation using event-related FMRI. In a monetary incentive encoding task, cues signaled high- or low-value reward for memorizing an upcoming scene. When tested 24 hr postscan, subjects were significantly more likely to remember scenes that followed cues for high-value rather than low-value reward. A monetary incentive delay task independently localized regions responsive to reward anticipation. In the encoding task, high-reward cues preceding remembered but not forgotten scenes activated the ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens, and hippocampus. Across subjects, greater activation in these regions predicted superior memory performance. Within subject, increased correlation between the hippocampus and ventral tegmental area was associated with enhanced long-term memory for the subsequent scene. These findings demonstrate that brain activation preceding stimulus encoding can predict declarative memory formation. The findings are consistent with the hypothesis that reward motivation promotes memory formation via dopamine release in the hippocampus prior to learning.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.036

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 50 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 977

Related

Metadata

Authors
Adcock, R. A., Thangavel, A., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Knutson, B., & Gabrieli, J. D. E.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Adcock, R. Alison
ORCID
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
507-517
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.036
OpenAlex
W2111873046
Cited by
977
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 44
FWCI
14.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH59940, R01MH059940)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
memory formation, reward anticipation, mesolimbic system, ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens, hippocampus, dopamine release, declarative memory, financial incentives
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Cues, Dopamine, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Motivation, Neural Pathways, Synaptic Transmission, Neuropsychological Tests, Nucleus Accumbens, Reward, Ventral Tegmental Area

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review