Cited by 90Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

Time-Resolved Decoding of Two Processing Chains during Dual-Task Interference

Open access
Marti, Sébastien, King, Jean-Rémi, Dehaene, Stanislas·2015·Neuron

Abstract

The human brain exhibits fundamental limitations in multitasking. When subjects engage in a primary task, their ability to respond to a second stimulus is degraded. Two competing models of multitasking have been proposed: either cognitive resources are shared between tasks, or they are allocated to each task serially. Using a novel combination of magneto-encephalography and multivariate pattern analyses, we obtained a precise spatio-temporal decomposition of the brain processes at work during multitasking. We discovered that each task relies on a sequence of brain processes. These sequences can operate in parallel for several hundred milliseconds but beyond ∼ 500 ms, they repel each other: processes evoked by the first task are shortened, while processes of the second task are either lengthened or postponed. These results contradict the resource-sharing model and further demonstrate that the serial model is incomplete. We therefore propose a new theoretical framework for the computational architecture underlying multitasking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.10.040

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early perceptual processing in the first 200 ms can be fully preserved on trials without conscious perception, especially under inattention, whereas conscious appraisal correlates with late events lagging at least 200 ms, such as the P300 or late-positive component, which vanishes almost entirely under inattention or during sleep.

    “The first 200 ms of brain activity, corresponding to early perceptual processing, can be fully preserved on trials without conscious perception, particularly under inattention conditions”

    From Conscious Processing and the Global Neuronal Workspace Hypothesis (2020) · cites this paper as Marti et al., 2015

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Early perceptual processing in the first 200 milliseconds can be similar or even identical between conscious and unconscious trials, but conscious perception is associated with late events such as the N2/P3b/P300 component.

    “Early perceptual processing in the first 200 milliseconds can be similar or even identical between conscious (i.e., reported) and unconscious (i.e., not reported) trials, [67][68][69] but conscious perception is associated with late events, such as the N2/P3b/P300 component of scalp-event-related potentials in humans.6,[70][71][72]”

    From An integrative, multiscale view on neural theories of consciousness (2024) · cites this paper as [67]

    The Results section, “Dual-Task Interference Differentially Affects Early and Late Brain Responses” (page unavailable), reports that early Task 2 responses were unaffected by inter-target lag while later responses changed. The Discussion links delayed conscious access to later frontoparietal activity. The cited paper does not establish that processing in the first 200 ms was identical on reported and unreported trials, or identify the late activity as a scalp N2/P3b/P300 component; its recordings were MEG. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The timing of conscious access can be delayed under conditions such as inattention or dual-task situations where the global workspace is already occupied by another conscious object.

    “The timing of conscious access can furthermore be delayed under certain conditions, such as inattention or dualtask situations where the global workspace is already occupied by another conscious object.67,73”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Geffroy D Rivière D Denghien N Souedet S Laguitton S Cointepas Y BrainVISA: a complete software platform for neuroimaging Python in Neuroscience Workshop (Paris) 2011 http://pythonneuro.sciencesconf.org/833/document

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marti, S., King, J.-R., & Dehaene, S.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Marti, Sébastien
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
88
Issue
6
Pages
1297-1307
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2177562842
Cited by
90
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
multitasking, dual-task interference, cognitive resource allocation, serial processing model, resource sharing models, time-resolved decoding, multivariate pattern analysis, magnetoencephalography, spatio-temporal decomposition
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Attention, Auditory Perception, Brain, Humans, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Visual Perception, Magnetoencephalography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review