CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 126Cerebrovascular and genetic disordersDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

White matter hyperintensities and within-person variability in community-dwelling adults aged 60–64 years

BUNCE, D, ANSTEY, K, CHRISTENSEN, H, DEAR, K, WEN, W, SACHDEV, P·2007·Neuropsychologia
DOI 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Estimates of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) derived from T2-weighted MRI were investigated in relation to cognitive performance in 469 healthy community-dwelling adults aged 60-64 years. Frontal lobe WMH but not WMH from other brain regions (temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes, anterior and posterior horn, periventricular body) were associated with elevated within-person reaction time (RT) variability (trial to trial fluctuations in RT performance) but not performance on several other cognitive tasks including psychomotor speed, memory, and global cognition. The findings are consistent with the view that elevated within-person variability is related to neurobiological disturbance, and that attentional mechanisms supported by the frontal cortex play a key role in this type of variability.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.006

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reaction time variability is associated with a higher proportion of white matter hyperintensities across frontal regions.

    “Finally, RTV has been associated with a higher proportion of white matter hyperintensities (i.e., small regions of high intensity observed on magnetic resonance imaging) across the frontal regions [61].”

    From Reaction Time Variability in ADHD: A Review (2012) · cites this paper as [61]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
BUNCE, D., ANSTEY, K., CHRISTENSEN, H., DEAR, K., WEN, W., & SACHDEV, P.
Affiliations
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
BUNCE, D
ORCID
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007
Volume
45
Issue
9
Pages
2009-2015
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.006
OpenAlex
W2011352093
Cited by
126
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
white matter hyperintensities, within-person variability, reaction time variability, frontal lobe, cognitive performance, attention, older adults, community-dwelling adults, T2-weighted MRI, psychomotor speed, memory
MeSH terms
Attention, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Regression Analysis, Residence Characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review