The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Farmers and their data: An examination of farmers’ reluctance to share their data through the lens of the laws impacting smart farming
Open accessAbstract
The absence of legal and regulatory frameworks around the collection, sharing and use of agricultural data contributes to the range of challenges currently being faced by farmers considering adoption of smart farming technologies.Many laws potentially influence the ownership, control of and access to data, in this paper we examine the attitudes of farmers to the collection, control, sharing and use of their farm data.Australian agriculture and the attitudes of Australian farmers to the adoption and uptake of smart farming technologies is used to highlight the tensions., however the issues and challenges raised are common to many agricultural industries throughout the world.We combine insights from a survey of Australian farmers with a legal analysis of the way in which agricultural data are collected, controlled, shared and used.We argue that the lack of transparency and clarity around issues such as data ownership, portability, privacy, trust and liability in the commercial relationships governing smart farming are contributing to farmers' reluctance to engage in the widespread sharing of their farm data that smart farming facilitates.At the heart of the concerns is the lack of trust between the farmers as data contributors, and those third parties who collect, aggregate and share their data.The aim of this paper is to examine the issues giving rise to this lack of trust.We conclude with recommendations on how to address these concerns and facilitate the improved adoption of smart farming technologies, focusing on the need for the social architecture of the agricultural data relationships to change.To achieve this change, open dialogue, education and awareness raising and good data governance are essential to help build trust in the adoption of smart farming systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Big Data in Smart Farming – A review
Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., & Bogaardt, M.-J. (2017) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023 · Cited by 3,378
Personalization versus Privacy: An Empirical Examination of the Online Consumer’s Dilemma
Chellappa, R. K., & Sin, R. G. (2005) · Information Technology and Management · doi:10.1007/s10799-005-5879-y · Cited by 1,023
Bansal, G., Zahedi, F. M., & Gefen, D. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.08.001 · Cited by 457
Big Data in food and agriculture
Bronson, K., & Knezevic, I. (2016) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951716648174 · Cited by 453
Eastwood, C., Klerkx, L., Ayre, M., & Dela Rue, B. (2019) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-017-9704-5 · Cited by 369
Jakku, E., Taylor, B., Fleming, A., Mason, C., Fielke, S., Sounness, C., & Thorburn, P. (2019) · NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.njas.2018.11.002 · Cited by 300
Self-citationPublicising Food: Big Data, Precision Agriculture, and Co‐Experimental Techniques of Addition
Carolan, M. (2017) · Sociologia Ruralis · doi:10.1111/soru.12120 · Cited by 252
The ethics of big data in big agriculture
Carbonell, I. M. (2016) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2016.1.405 · Cited by 244
Is big data for big farming or for everyone? Perceptions in the Australian grains industry
Fleming, A., Jakku, E., Lim‐Camacho, L., Taylor, B., & Thorburn, P. J. (2018) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-018-0501-y · Cited by 171
Self-citationAndrejevic, M. (2014) · International journal of communication · Cited by 160
Cited by
Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., & Labarthe, P. (2019) · NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.njas.2019.100315 · Cited by 1,307
Self-citationThe problem with growing corporate concentration and power in the global food system
Clapp, J. (2021) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00297-7 · Cited by 359
Agriculture 4.0: Making it work for people, production, and the planet
Rose, D. C., Wheeler, R., Winter, M., Lobley, M., & Chivers, C.-A. (2021) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104933 · Cited by 346
Application of digital technologies for ensuring agricultural productivity
Abiri, R., Rizan, N., Balasundram, S. K., Shahbazi, A. B., & Abdul-Hamid, H. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22601 · Cited by 334
Digitalisation of agricultural knowledge and advice networks: A state-of-the-art review
Fielke, S., Taylor, B., & Jakku, E. (2020) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102763 · Cited by 331
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiseman, L., Sanderson, J., Zhang, A., & Jakku, E.
- Venue
- NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 90-91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 1573-5214 (ISSN-L)
- 2212-1307
- OpenAlex
- W2944766936
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 250.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Farmers and their data: An examination of farmers’ reluctance to share their data through the lens of the laws impacting smart farming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.njas.2019.04.007
- The paper
- Wiseman, L., Sanderson, J., Zhang, A., & Jakku, E. (2019). Farmers and their data: An examination of farmers’ reluctance to share their data through the lens of the laws impacting smart farming. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.04.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.