The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of CFD models for mono- and polydisperse air–water two-phase flows in pipes
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Some of the deficiencies present in the formulations proposed by Antal and Tomiyama have been improved by Frank et al. [264], who proposed a generalized wall lubrication force coefficient that does not consider the pipe diameter as a geometry length scale.”
From Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [264]
Citations
Cites
Theoretical model for drop and bubble breakup in turbulent dispersions
Luo, H., & Svendsen, H. F. (1996) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.690420505 · Cited by 1,250
Bubble coalescence and break-up in air-sparged bubble columns
Prince, M. J., & Blanch, H. W. (1990) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.690361004 · Cited by 1,238
Analysis of phase distribution in fully developed laminar bubbly two-phase flow
Antal, S. P., Lahey, R. T., & Flaherty, J. E. (1991) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/0301-9322(91)90029-3 · Cited by 878
Struggle with computational bubble dynamics
(1998) · Multiphase Science and Technology · doi:10.1615/multscientechn.v10.i4.40 · Cited by 663
Development of co-current air–water flow in a vertical pipe
Lucas, D., Krepper, E., & Prasser, H.-M. (2005) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2005.07.004 · Cited by 194
Self-citationEvolution of the structure of a gas–liquid two-phase flow in a large vertical pipe
Prasser, H.-M., Beyer, M., Carl, H., Gregor, S., Lucas, D., Pietruske, H., Schütz, P., & Weiß, F.-P. (2007) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.02.018 · Cited by 132
Self-citationCFD Best Practice Guidelines for CFD Code Validation for Reactor- Safety Applications
Menter, F. R., Hemström, B., Mühlbauer, P., Scheuerer, M., Smith, B., & Willemsen, S. (2002) · Cited by 122
A simplified method proposal for practical determination of aperiodic two-phase flow instability
Lorenzini, E. C. (1981) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/0301-9322(81)90035-5 · Cited by 63
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Frank, Th., October 2003. Bubble flow in vertical pipes—investigation of the testcase VDL-01/1 (FZR-074) for the validation of CFD. ANSYS CFX Germany. Technical Report No. TR-03-09, pp. 34.
- Frank, Th., January 2006. Abschlußbericht zum Forschungsvorhaben 150 1271 “Entwicklung von CFD-Software zur Simulation mehrdimensionaler Strömungen im Reaktorkühlsystem”. Technical Report TR-06-01, ANSYS Germany, Otterfing, pp. 72.
- Prasser, H.-M., Lucas, D., Krepper, E., Baldauf, D., Böttger, A., Rohde, U., et al., June 2003. Strömungskarten und Modelle für transiente Zweiphasenströmungen. Forschungszentrum Rossendorf, Germany. Report No. FZR-379, pp. 183.
- Tomiyama, A., 2002. Single bubbles in stagnant liquids and in linear shear flows. Workshop on Measurement Technology (MTWS5), FZ Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany, pp. 3–19.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The inhomogeneous MUSIG model for the simulation of polydispersed flows
Krepper, E., Lucas, D., Frank, T., Prasser, H.-M., & Zwart, P. J. (2008) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.01.004 · Cited by 275
Self-citationBaseline closure model for dispersed bubbly flow: Bubble coalescence and breakup
Liao, Y., Rzehak, R., Lucas, D., & Krepper, E. (2014) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2014.09.042 · Cited by 203
Self-citationTwo-Phase Bubble Columns: A Comprehensive Review
Besagni, G., Inzoli, F., & Ziegenhein, T. (2018) · ChemEngineering · doi:10.3390/chemengineering2020013 · Cited by 190
Pourtousi, M., Sahu, J. N., & Ganesan, P. B. (2013) · Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification · doi:10.1016/j.cep.2013.11.001 · Cited by 187
Computational modelling of flash boiling flows: A literature survey
Liao, Y., & Lucas, D. (2017) · International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.03.121 · Cited by 173
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Frank, T., Zwart, P. J., Krepper, E., Prasser, H.-M., & Lucas, D.
- Affiliations
- Ansys (Germany) (DE)
- Ansys (Canada) (CA)
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (DE)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Frank, Th.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nuclear Engineering and Design
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 238
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 647-659
- ISSN
- 0029-5493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046276638
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 10.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nuclear Engineering and Design (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Nuclear Energy and Engineering › Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
- Keywords
- multiphase flow simulation, air-water flow, Eulerian multiphase model, interphase momentum transfer, bubble size distribution, model validation, nuclear reactor safety, pipe flow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
