Cited by 237Nuclear Engineering Thermal-HydraulicsFluid Dynamics and Heat TransferParticle Dynamics in Fluid Flows

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validation of CFD models for mono- and polydisperse air–water two-phase flows in pipes

Frank, Th., Zwart, P.J., Krepper, E., Prasser, H.-M., Lucas, D.·2008·Nuclear Engineering and Design

DOI 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.02.056

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.02.056

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Theoretical model for drop and bubble breakup in turbulent dispersions
Luo, H., & Svendsen, H. F. (1996) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.690420505 · Cited by 1,250
Bubble coalescence and break-up in air-sparged bubble columns
Prince, M. J., & Blanch, H. W. (1990) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.690361004 · Cited by 1,238
Analysis of phase distribution in fully developed laminar bubbly two-phase flow
Antal, S. P., Lahey, R. T., & Flaherty, J. E. (1991) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/0301-9322(91)90029-3 · Cited by 878
Struggle with computational bubble dynamics
(1998) · Multiphase Science and Technology · doi:10.1615/multscientechn.v10.i4.40 · Cited by 663
Development of co-current air–water flow in a vertical pipe
Lucas, D., Krepper, E., & Prasser, H.-M. (2005) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2005.07.004 · Cited by 194
Self-citation
Evolution of the structure of a gas–liquid two-phase flow in a large vertical pipe
Prasser, H.-M., Beyer, M., Carl, H., Gregor, S., Lucas, D., Pietruske, H., Schütz, P., & Weiß, F.-P. (2007) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.02.018 · Cited by 132
Self-citation
CFD Best Practice Guidelines for CFD Code Validation for Reactor- Safety Applications
Menter, F. R., Hemström, B., Mühlbauer, P., Scheuerer, M., Smith, B., & Willemsen, S. (2002) · Cited by 122
A simplified method proposal for practical determination of aperiodic two-phase flow instability
Lorenzini, E. C. (1981) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/0301-9322(81)90035-5 · Cited by 63

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

Frank, Th., October 2003. Bubble flow in vertical pipes—investigation of the testcase VDL-01/1 (FZR-074) for the validation of CFD. ANSYS CFX Germany. Technical Report No. TR-03-09, pp. 34.
Frank, Th., January 2006. Abschlußbericht zum Forschungsvorhaben 150 1271 “Entwicklung von CFD-Software zur Simulation mehrdimensionaler Strömungen im Reaktorkühlsystem”. Technical Report TR-06-01, ANSYS Germany, Otterfing, pp. 72.
Prasser, H.-M., Lucas, D., Krepper, E., Baldauf, D., Böttger, A., Rohde, U., et al., June 2003. Strömungskarten und Modelle für transiente Zweiphasenströmungen. Forschungszentrum Rossendorf, Germany. Report No. FZR-379, pp. 183.
Tomiyama, A., 2002. Single bubbles in stagnant liquids and in linear shear flows. Workshop on Measurement Technology (MTWS5), FZ Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany, pp. 3–19.

Sorted by citations

The inhomogeneous MUSIG model for the simulation of polydispersed flows
Krepper, E., Lucas, D., Frank, T., Prasser, H.-M., & Zwart, P. J. (2008) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.01.004 · Cited by 275
Self-citation
Baseline closure model for dispersed bubbly flow: Bubble coalescence and breakup
Liao, Y., Rzehak, R., Lucas, D., & Krepper, E. (2014) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2014.09.042 · Cited by 203
Self-citation
Two-Phase Bubble Columns: A Comprehensive Review
Besagni, G., Inzoli, F., & Ziegenhein, T. (2018) · ChemEngineering · doi:10.3390/chemengineering2020013 · Cited by 190
Effect of interfacial forces and turbulence models on predicting flow pattern inside the bubble column
Pourtousi, M., Sahu, J. N., & Ganesan, P. B. (2013) · Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification · doi:10.1016/j.cep.2013.11.001 · Cited by 187
Computational modelling of flash boiling flows: A literature survey
Liao, Y., & Lucas, D. (2017) · International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.03.121 · Cited by 173
Self-citation
Two-phase bubbly flow simulation using CFD method: A review of models for interfacial forces
Khan, I., Wang, M., Zhang, Y., Tian, W., Su, G., & Qiu, S. (2020) · Progress in Nuclear Energy · doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2020.103360 · Cited by 171
The effect of liquid phase properties on bubble column fluid dynamics: Gas holdup, flow regime transition, bubble size distributions and shapes, interfacial areas and foaming phenomena
Besagni, G., & Inzoli, F. (2017) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2017.03.043 · Cited by 139
Investigations on hydrodynamics and mass transfer in gas–liquid stirred reactor using computational fluid dynamics
Ranganathan, P., & Savithri, S. (2011) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2011.03.007 · Cited by 114
CFD for subcooled flow boiling: Coupling wall boiling and population balance models
Krepper, E., Rzehak, R., Lifante, C., & Frank, T. (2012) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.11.010 · Cited by 109
Self-citation
Numerical investigation of the interphase forces and turbulence closure in 3D square bubble columns
Masood, R. M. A., & Delgado, A. R. (2014) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2014.01.004 · Cited by 103
A combination of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy system (ANFIS) for prediction of the bubble column hydrodynamics
Pourtousi, M., Sahu, J. N., Ganesan, P. B., Shamshirband, S., & Redzwan, G. (2015) · Powder Technology · doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2015.01.038 · Cited by 99
Unified modeling of bubbly flows in pipes, bubble columns, and airlift columns
Rzehak, R., Ziegenhein, T., Kriebitzsch, S., Krepper, E., & Lucas, D. (2016) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2016.04.056 · Cited by 101
Self-citation
Numerical investigation of models for drag, lift, wall lubrication and turbulent dispersion forces for the simulation of gas–liquid two-phase flow
Yamoah, S., Martı́nez-Cuenca, R., Monrós-Andreu, G., Chiva, S., & Macián‐Juan, R. (2015) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2015.04.007 · Cited by 98
Water Model and CFD-PBM Coupled Model of Gas-Liquid-Slag Three-Phase Flow in Ladle Metallurgy
Li, L., Liu, Z., Li, B., Matsuura, H., & Tsukihashi, F. (2015) · ISIJ International · doi:10.2355/isijinternational.55.1337 · Cited by 90
Study of the interfacial forces and turbulence models in a bubble column
da Silva, M. K., d’Ávila, M. A., & Mori, M. (2012) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.04.007 · Cited by 88
Computation and validation of the interphase force models for bubbly flow
Wang, Q., & Yao, W. F. (2016) · International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.03.064 · Cited by 81
A more fundamental wall lubrication force from turbulent dispersion regularization for multiphase CFD applications
Lubchenko, N., Magolan, B., Sugrue, R., & Baglietto, E. (2017) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.09.003 · Cited by 81
Inhomogeneous MUSIG Model - a Population Balance Approach for Polydispersed Bubbly Flows
Frank, T., Zwart, P. J., Shi, J., Krepper, E., Lucas, D., & Rohde, U. L. (2005) · Cited by 79
Self-citation
Investigations on the effect of tip clearance gap and inducer on the transport of air-water two-phase flow by centrifugal pumps
Parikh, T., Mansour, M., & Thévenin, D. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2020.115554 · Cited by 78
Development of a generalized coalescence and breakup closure for the inhomogeneous MUSIG model
Liao, Y., Lucas, D., Krepper, E., & Schmidtke, M. (2010) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.04.025 · Cited by 77
Self-citation
Applications of wire-mesh sensors in multiphase flows
Peña, H. F. V., & Rodríguez, O. M. H. (2015) · Flow Measurement and Instrumentation · doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2015.06.024 · Cited by 68
Effect of bubble diameter size on prediction of flow pattern in Euler–Euler simulation of homogeneous bubble column regime
Pourtousi, M., Ganesan, P. B., & Sahu, J. N. (2015) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2015.08.018 · Cited by 65
Direct Numerical Simulations of spherical bubbles in vertical turbulent channel flow. Influence of bubble size and bidispersity
Santarelli, C., & Fröhlich, J. (2016) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2016.01.004 · Cited by 63
Simulation of gas–liquid flow in a helical static mixer
Zidouni, F., Krepper, E., Rzehak, R., Rabha, S. S., Schubert, M., & Hampel, U. (2015) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2015.06.052 · Cited by 65
Self-citation
Modelling mass transfer in an aerated 0.2 m3 vessel agitated by Rushton, Phasejet and Combijet impellers
Moilanen, P., Laakkonen, M., Visuri, O., Alopaeus, V., & Aittamaa, J. R. (2008) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2008.01.033 · Cited by 63
Prediction of gas–liquid flow in an annular gap bubble column using a bi-dispersed Eulerian model
Guédon, G. R., Besagni, G., & Inzoli, F. (2016) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2016.12.015 · Cited by 54
Effects of bubble coalescence and breakup models on the simulation of bubble columns
Zhang, X., & Luo, Z. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2020.115850 · Cited by 53
Novel experimental measuring techniques required to provide data for CFD validation
Prasser, H.-M. (2007) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.02.050 · Cited by 51
Self-citation
Bubble coalescence and breakup in turbulent bubbly wake of a ventilated hydrofoil
Karn, A., Shao, S., Arndt, R. E. A., & Hong, J. (2015) · Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science · doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.10.003 · Cited by 49
Changes in the Number of Membership Functions for Predicting the Gas Volume Fraction in Two-Phase Flow Using Grid Partition Clustering of the ANFIS Method
Babanezhad, M., Nakhjiri, A. T., & Shirazian, S. (2020) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.0c02117 · Cited by 48
Extension of the inhomogeneous MUSIG model for bubble condensation
Lucas, D., Frank, T., Lifante, C., Zwart, P. J., & Burns, A. D. (2011) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.10.039 · Cited by 47
Self-citation
Progress in multiphase computational fluid dynamics
Lahey, R. T., Baglietto, E., & Bolotnov, I. A. (2021) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.111018 · Cited by 46
Bubbly flows with fixed polydispersity: Validation of a baseline closure model
Rzehak, R., & Krepper, E. (2015) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.03.005 · Cited by 47
Self-citation
Modeling of bubble coalescence and break-up in turbulent bubbly flow
Mukin, R. V. (2014) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2014.02.008 · Cited by 46
Large-Eddy Simulation of Transient Horizontal Gas–Liquid Flow in Continuous Casting Using Dynamic Subgrid-Scale Model
Liu, Z., & Li, B. (2017) · Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B · doi:10.1007/s11663-017-0947-3 · Cited by 46
Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review
Luzi, G., & McHardy, C. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15113966 · Cited by 44
Interfacial forces used in two-phase flow numerical simulation
Chuang, T.-J., & Hibiki, T. (2017) · International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.05.062 · Cited by 45
Effects of Interphase Forces on Multiphase Flow and Bubble Distribution in Continuous Casting Strands
Chen, W., & Zhang, L. (2021) · Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B · doi:10.1007/s11663-020-02046-w · Cited by 44
CFD simulation of bubble column flows: An explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model approach
Masood, R. M. A., Rauh, C., & Delgado, A. R. (2014) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2014.06.008 · Cited by 43
CFD modelling of polydispersed bubbly two-phase flow around an obstacle
Krepper, E., Beyer, M., Frank, T., Lucas, D., & Prasser, H.-M. (2009) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.06.015 · Cited by 43
Self-citation
Multiple Size Group Modeling of Polydispersed Bubbly Flow in the Mold: An Analysis of Turbulence and Interfacial Force Models
Liu, Z., Qi, F., Li, B., & Jiang, M. (2014) · Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B · doi:10.1007/s11663-014-0255-0 · Cited by 41
CFD modeling of reactive absorption of CO2 in aqueous NaOH in a rectangular bubble column: Comparison of mass transfer and enhancement factor model
Liu, J., Zhou, P., Liu, L., Chen, S., Song, Y., & Yan, H. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2020.116218 · Cited by 43
Effect of Interphase Forces on Gas–Liquid Multiphase Flow in RH Degasser
Zhu, B., Liu, Q., Kong, M., Yang, J., Li, D., & Chattopadhyay, K. (2017) · Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B · doi:10.1007/s11663-017-1006-9 · Cited by 40
An open‐source population balance modeling framework for the simulation of polydisperse multiphase flows
Lehnigk, R., Bainbridge, W., Liao, Y., Lucas, D., Niemi, T., Peltola, J., & Schlegel, F. (2021) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.17539 · Cited by 44
Self-citation
Experimental and numerical investigations of natural circulation phenomena in passive safety systems for decay heat removal in large pools
Krepper, E., & Beyer, M. (2010) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.05.050 · Cited by 39
Self-citation
Computational fluid dynamics
Joshi, J. B., Nandakumar, K., Patwardhan, A. W., Nayak, A. K., Pareek, V. K., Gumulya, M. M., Wu, C. L., Minocha, N., Pal, E., Kumar, M., et al. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-102337-2.00002-x · Cited by 41
Effect of coalescence and breakup on bubble size distributions in a two-dimensional packed bed
Jo, D., & Revankar, S. T. (2010) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2010.04.019 · Cited by 40
Numerical modeling of bubble-driven liquid metal flows with external static magnetic field
Miao, X., Lucas, D., Ren, Z., Eckert, S., & Gunter Gerbeth, B. (2012) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2012.07.014 · Cited by 40
Self-citation
Numerical Simulation of Polydispersed Flow in Bubble Columns with the Inhomogeneous Multi‐Size‐Group Model
Ziegenhein, T., Rzehak, R., Krepper, E., & Lucas, D. (2013) · Chemie Ingenieur Technik · doi:10.1002/cite.201200223 · Cited by 38
Self-citation
Determination of diffuser bubble size in computational fluid dynamics models to predict oxygen transfer in spiral roll aeration tanks
Terashima, M., So, M., Goel, R., & Yasui, H. (2016) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.07.001 · Cited by 37
A quantitative and generalized assessment of bubble-induced turbulence models for gas-liquid systems
Magolan, B., Lubchenko, N., & Baglietto, E. (2019) · Chemical Engineering Science X · doi:10.1016/j.cesx.2019.100009 · Cited by 37
Numerical simulation of two-phase gas–liquid flow through gradual expansions/contractions
Ahmadpour, A., Abadi, S. M. A. N. R., & Kouhikamali, R. (2015) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.10.008 · Cited by 36
Computational modelling of the HyperVapotron cooling technique
Milnes, J., Burns, A. D., & Drikakis, D. (2012) · Fusion Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.06.014 · Cited by 35
Upward bubbly flows in a square pipe with a sudden expansion: Bubble dispersion and reattachment length
Kim, Y., & Park, H. (2019) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.06.017 · Cited by 34
Two phase flow regime identification using infrared sensor and volume of fluids method
Seshadri, A., Adhavan, J., Venkatesan, M., Das, S. K., & Balakrishnan, A. R. (2016) · Flow Measurement and Instrumentation · doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2016.08.012 · Cited by 33
Numerical analysis for interphase forces of gas-liquid flow in a multiphase pump
Liu, M., Cao, S. C., & Cao, S. (2018) · Engineering Computations · doi:10.1108/ec-04-2018-0161 · Cited by 33
Droplet breakage and coalescence models for the flow of water-in-oil emulsions through a valve-like element
Mitre, J. F., Lage, P. L. C., Souza, M. A., Silva, E., Barca, L. F., Moraes, A. D. O. S., Coutinho, R. C. C., & Fonseca, E. F. (2014) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2014.03.020 · Cited by 33
Vertical upward two-phase flow CFD using interfacial area transport equation
Chuang, T.-J., & Hibiki, T. (2015) · Progress in Nuclear Energy · doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2015.07.008 · Cited by 34
Thermo-hydrodynamic modeling of flow boiling through the horizontal tube using Eulerian two-fluid modeling approach
Pal, R. K., & Kumar, K. R. (2021) · International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120794 · Cited by 31
CFD-simulation of boiling in a heated pipe including flow pattern transitions using the GENTOP concept
Höhne, T., Krepper, E., Montoya, G., & Lucas, D. (2017) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.06.047 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
Effects of interaction models on upward subcooled boiling flow in annulus
Zhang, X., Yu, T., Cong, T., & Peng, M. (2018) · Progress in Nuclear Energy · doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.12.004 · Cited by 30
CFD-PBM simulation of bubble columns: Effect of parameters in the class method for solving PBEs
Zhang, X., Zheng, R.-Q., & Luo, Z. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2020.115853 · Cited by 31
Effect of electrolytes on interphase mass transfer in microbubble-sparged airlift reactors
Taweel, A. M. A., Idhbeaa, A. O., & Ghanem, A. (2013) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2013.06.013 · Cited by 29
Experimental investigation of two-phase pipe flow with ultrafast X-ray tomography and comparison with state-of-the-art CFD simulations
Banowski, M., Hampel, U., Krepper, E., Beyer, M., & Lucas, D. (2017) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.06.035 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Two-way coupling calculation for multiphase flow and decarburization during RH refining
Chen, S., Lei, H., Wang, M., Yang, B., Dai, L., & Zhao, Y. (2019) · Vacuum · doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2019.06.018 · Cited by 28
CFD-PBM Simulation of Bubble Columns: Sensitivity Analysis of the Nondrag Forces
Zhang, X., Yan, W., & Luo, Z. (2020) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.0c02759 · Cited by 28
Development of a coalescence model due to turbulence for the population balance equation
Das, S. K. (2015) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2015.04.026 · Cited by 27
Analysis of breakage and coalescence models for bubble columns
Mitre, J. F., Takahashi, R. S. M., Ribeiro, C. P., & Lage, P. L. C. (2010) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2010.08.023 · Cited by 26
Investigation of bubble breakup and coalescence in a packed-bed reactor – Part 1: A comparative study of bubble breakup and coalescence models
Jo, D., & Revankar, S. T. (2011) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.06.016 · Cited by 27
Numerical analysis of the effects of air on light distribution in a bubble column photobioreactor
McHardy, C., Luzi, G., Lindenberger, C., Agudo, J. R., Delgado, A., & Rauh, C. (2018) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2018.02.016 · Cited by 25
Benchmark DEBORA: Assessment of MCFD compared to high-pressure boiling pipe flow measurements
Bois, G., Fillion, P., François, F., Burlot, A., Ali, A. B. H., Khaware, A., Sanyal, J., Rehm, M., Farges, B., Vinauger, F., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2024.104920 · Cited by 26
Comparison between different strategies for the realization of flashing-light effects – Pneumatic mixing and flashing illumination
Luzi, G., McHardy, C., Lindenberger, C., Rauh, C., & Delgado, A. (2019) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2018.101404 · Cited by 24
Insights into gas flow behavior in venturi aerator by CFD-PBM model and verification of its efficiency in sludge reduction through O3 aeration
Li, H., Zhang, Q., Zeng, M., Cao, J., Zhao, Q., & Hao, L. (2023) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103960 · Cited by 24
A study of adiabatic two-phase flows using the two-group interfacial area transport equations with a modified two-fluid model
Lee, D. Y., Liu, Y., Hibiki, T., Ishii, M., & Buchanan, J. R. (2013) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2013.07.008 · Cited by 23
Computational fluid-dynamic modeling of the mono-dispersed homogeneous flow regime in bubble columns
Besagni, G., Guédon, G. R., & Inzoli, F. (2018) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.03.003 · Cited by 27
Modelling of bubble breakage and coalescence in stirred and sparged bioreactor using the Euler-Lagrange approach
Krýsa, P., & Šoóš, M. (2022) · International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.123466 · Cited by 24
Bubble‐separation dynamics in a planar cyclone: Experiments and CFD simulations
Xu, X. C., Xiaoling, G., Qian, Y., Wang, H., & Yang, Q. (2018) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.16115 · Cited by 22
Comparison and uncertainty quantification of two-fluid models for bubbly flows with NEPTUNE_CFD and STAR-CCM+
Marfaing, O., Guingo, M., Laviéville, J., Mimouni, S., Baglietto, E., Lubchenko, N., Magolan, B., Sugrue, R., & Nadiga, B. (2018) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.05.028 · Cited by 22
A population balance approach considering heat and mass transfer—Experiments and CFD simulations
Krepper, E., Beyer, M., Lucas, D., & Schmidtke, M. (2011) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.05.003 · Cited by 22
Self-citation
Computational Fluid Dynamics Based Modeling of Gas Absorption Process: A State-of-the-Art Review
Liu, D., Wang, Z., Cai, Y., Chen, J., Jin, J., & Zhao, B. (2024) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.3c02941 · Cited by 22
Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of the Air–Water Two-Phase Vertically Upward Bubbly Flow in Pipes
Lote, D. A., Vinod, V., & Patwardhan, A. W. (2018) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.8b01579 · Cited by 21
Numerical investigation on characteristics of the onset of nucleate boiling in petal-shape fuel rod bundle assembly
Du, L., Jiang, Z., Zhang, W., Sun, J., Jin, G., & Cai, W. (2023) · Annals of Nuclear Energy · doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2023.110189 · Cited by 20
A computational review of various inter-facial forces in fully developed multiphase fluid under different flow patterns in vertical column
Shah, F., De-sheng, Z., & Geng, L. (2025) · Propulsion and Power Research · doi:10.1016/j.jppr.2025.02.007 · Cited by 20
CFD simulation of bubbly flow around an obstacle in a vertical pipe with a focus on breakup and coalescence modelling
Tas-Koehler, S., Neumann, M., Liao, Y., Krepper, E., & Hampel, U. (2020) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103528 · Cited by 19
Self-citation
Numerical modeling of reactive bubbly flows based on Euler-Lagrange approach
Huang, Z., Yan, H., Liu, L., Gong, H. R., & Zhou, P. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2021.116640 · Cited by 19
Current and Potential Distribution in Two-Phase (Gas Evolving) Electrochemical Reactors by the Finite Volume Method
Colli, A. N., & Bisang, J. M. (2022) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ac5d90 · Cited by 19
Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Argon–Steel (–Slag) Multiphase Flow in an Ruhrstahl–Heraeus Degasser: A Review of Past Numerical Studies
Chen, G., Wang, Q., & He, S. (2022) · steel research international · doi:10.1002/srin.202200298 · Cited by 18
Numerical investigation on the gas entrainment of ventilated partial cavity based on a multiscale modelling approach
Xiang, M., Li, K., Tu, J. Y., & Zhang, H. W. (2016) · Applied Ocean Research · doi:10.1016/j.apor.2016.08.003 · Cited by 18
Effects of interphase momentum exchange models on simulation of subcooled flow boiling
Naghibzadeh, S. M., Goharkhah, M., Sharifpur, M., & Meyer, J. P. (2020) · International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.104863 · Cited by 18
Experimental database on steam–water flow with phase transfer in a vertical pipe
Lucas, D., Beyer, M., & Szalinski, L. (2013) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.10.002 · Cited by 17
Self-citation
CFD-PBM approach for the gas-liquid flow in a nanobubble generator with honeycomb structure
Ren, F., Nao-Aki, N. O. D. A., Ueda, T., Sano, Y., TAKASE, Y., Umekage, T., Yonezawa, Y., & Tanaka, H. (2018) · Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/01932691.2018.1470009 · Cited by 18
Influence of Interphase Forces on Onset of Fully Developed Subcooled Flow Boiling at High Pressure
Pan, Y., Li, Z., & Wang, H. (2021) · International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121337 · Cited by 17
The dependence of wall lubrication force on liquid velocity in turbulent bubbly two-phase flows
Nguyen, V. T., Song, C.-H., Bae, B.-U., & Euh, D.-J. (2013) · Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/00223131.2013.807999 · Cited by 17
Development of a diffusion-inertia model for calculating bubble turbulent flows: Isothermal polydispersed flow in a vertical pipe
Zaichik, L. I., Mukin, R. V., Mukina, L. S., & Strizhov, V. F. (2012) · High Temperature · doi:10.1134/s0018151x12040220 · Cited by 17
Modelling bubble induced turbulence for gas-liquid bubbly flow in a vertical pipe
Islam, A. S. M. A., & Bergstrom, D. J. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2018.11.061 · Cited by 16
New Two-Fluid Model Near-Wall Averaging and Consistent Matching for Turbulent Bubbly Flows
Vaidheeswaran, A., Prabhudharwadkar, D. M., Guilbert, P., Buchanan, J. R., & de Bertodano, M. L. (2016) · Journal of Fluids Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4034327 · Cited by 16
CFD Simulation of Average and Local Gas–Liquid Flow Properties in Stirred Tank Reactors with Multiple Rushton Impellers
Pan, A., Xie, M., Li, C., Xia, J., Chu, J., & Zhuang, Y. (2017) · JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN · doi:10.1252/jcej.16we242 · Cited by 15
Numerical simulation of local bubble size distribution in bubble columns operated at heterogeneous regime
Zhang, X., Yan, W., & Luo, Z. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2020.116266 · Cited by 15
Thermal hydraulics simulation of the RD-14M steam generator facility
Corzo, S. F., Godino, D. M., Nigro, N. M., & Ramajo, D. E. (2017) · Annals of Nuclear Energy · doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2017.03.028 · Cited by 14
Experimental study of single Taylor bubbles rising in vertical and slightly deviated circular tubes
de Azevedo, M. B., Faccini, J. L. H., & Su, J. (2020) · Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science · doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2020.110109 · Cited by 14

Authors: Frank, T., Zwart, P. J., Krepper, E., Prasser, H.-M., & Lucas, D.
Affiliations: Ansys (Germany) (DE)
Ansys (Canada) (CA)
Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (DE)
ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author: Frank, Th.
ORCID: Krepper, E.
Lucas, D.
Venue: Nuclear Engineering and Design
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2008-03
Volume: 238
Issue: 3
Pages: 647-659
ISSN: 0029-5493 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.02.056
OpenAlex: W2046276638
Cited by: 237
References: 8
Citations by year: 2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI: 10.68
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations: Nuclear Engineering and Design (publishedVersion)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Energy › Nuclear Energy and Engineering › Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
Keywords: multiphase flow simulation, air-water flow, Eulerian multiphase model, interphase momentum transfer, bubble size distribution, model validation, nuclear reactor safety, pipe flow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Validation of CFD models for mono- and polydisperse air–water two-phase flows in pipes

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks