Cited by 66Fluid Dynamics and MixingParticle Dynamics in Fluid FlowsFluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer

Comparative study of wall-force models for the simulation of bubbly flows

Rzehak, Roland, Krepper, Eckhard, Lifante, Conxita·2012·Nuclear Engineering and Design

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.07.009

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rzehak, R., Krepper, E., & Lifante, C.
Affiliations
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (DE)
  • Ansys (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Rzehak, Roland
Venue
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
253
Pages
41-49
ISSN
0029-5493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017913315
Cited by
66
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nuclear Engineering and Design (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Keywords
bubbly flow, void fraction, bubble-wall interaction, air-water flow, round pipe, multiphase flow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review