Cited by 73Nutrition and Health in AgingDysphagia Assessment and ManagementGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Multidisciplinary nutritional support for undernutrition in nursing home and home-care: A cluster randomized controlled trial

Open access
Beck, Anne Marie, Christensen, Annette Gøgsig, Hansen, Birthe Stenbæk, Damsbo-Svendsen, Signe, Kreinfeldt Skovgaard Møller, Tina·2016·Nutrition

Abstract

Objective To assess the effect of multidisciplinary nutritional support for undernutrition in older adults in nursing home and home-care identified with the validated Eating Validation Scheme (EVS). Methods An 11 wk cluster randomized trial with a home-care (3 clusters) or nursing home (3 clusters) setting as the unit of randomization. Before starting the study, a train-the-trainer course was performed to educate the nutrition coordinators. In addition to the nutrition coordinator, the participants assigned to the intervention group strategy received multidisciplinary nutrition support. Focus was on treatment of the potentially modifiable nutritional risk factors identified with the EVS, by involving the physiotherapist, registered dietitian, and occupational therapist, as relevant and independent of the municipality's ordinary assessment and referral system. Outcome parameters were quality of life (by means of EuroQol-5D-3L), physical performance (30-seconds chair stand), nutritional status (weight and hand-grip strength), oral care, fall incidents, hospital admissions, rehabilitation stay, moving to nursing homes (participants from home-care), and mortality. Results Respectively, 55 (46 from 2 home-care clusters) and 40 (18 from 1 home-care cluster) were identified with the EVS and comprised the intervention and control group. A difference after 11 wk in quality of life (0.758 [0.222] versus 0.534 [0.355], P = 0.001), 30-seconds chair stand (47% versus 17% improved, P = 0.005) and oral care (1.1 [0.3] versus 1.3 [0.5], P = 0.021) was observed. There was a almost significant difference in mortality (2% versus 13%, P = 0.079). Conclusions Multidisciplinary nutritional support in older adults in nursing home and home-care could have a positive effect on quality of life, muscle strength, and oral care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nut.2015.08.009

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Four relevant RCTs with several sub-studies of low to acceptable quality focusing on multimodal and multidisciplinary interventions were identified.

    “Four relevant RCTs with several sub-studies of low to acceptable quality focusing on multimodal and multidisciplinary interventions (combining more than two intervention strategies) were identified (48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57):”
  • Positive effects on various outcome parameters were reported in multimodal and multidisciplinary intervention studies, but results were not always consistent.

    “Positive effects on various outcome parameter were reported (e.g.dietary intake (49,50,53), nutritional status, the incidence of falls (53,56), fall-related injuries (56), health status (55), physical performance (48)(49)(50)(51)57), social activity (49,50), costeffectiveness (52) and quality of life (48,51)), results were however not always consistent.”
  • Some of the included RCTs had participants with impaired cognition.

    “some of the included RCTs had participants with impaired cognition [26,41,42,53]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beck, A. M., Christensen, A. G., Hansen, B. S., Damsbo-Svendsen, S., & Kreinfeldt Skovgaard Møller, T.
Affiliations
Metropolitan University College (DK)
Corresponding author
Beck, Anne Marie
Venue
Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
199-205
ISSN
0899-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139955578
Cited by
73
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
malnutrition, older adults, nursing homes, home care, quality of life, physical performance, grip strength, oral care, mortality, nutritional risk factors
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Weight, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Home Care Services, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Male, Nursing Homes, Nutritional Status, Patient Compliance, Quality of Life, Socioeconomic Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Cluster Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Nutritional Support, Hand Strength, Malnutrition, Muscle Strength, Nutritionists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review