Cited by 14Celiac Disease Research and ManagementDietetics, Nutrition, and EducationNutritional Studies and Diet

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of the Dietitian Integrated Evaluation Tool for Gluten-free Diets (DIET-GFD)

Open access

Abstract

Objectives Celiac disease (CD) treatment involves a gluten-free diet (GFD). There is no standardized tool for dietitians to objectively grade GFD adherence. This study aimed to develop a standardized tool for dietitians to evaluate and communicate GFD adherence. Methods Participants were recruited from the Manitoba Celiac Disease Cohort. Using a consensus process, an expert panel of gastroenterologists, dietitians, clinical health psychologists, and persons with CD developed the Dietitian Integrated Evaluation Tool for Gluten-free Diets (DIET-GFD). Two dietitians performed duplicate assessments of 27 newly diagnosed participants who had been advised to follow a GFD. The global adherence scale was further revised after panel discussions of the cases where there was uncertainty or discordance on dietitian ratings. Subsequently, the scoring system was evaluated using duplicate assessments of an additional 37 participants with CD. Interrater agreement was assessed using square-weight Cohen's kappa. Results The DIET-GFD includes features related to frequency and quantity of gluten ingestion based on self-reporting and food frequency evaluation, shopping and dining habits, how and where food is prepared and consumed, eating behaviors, and label reading skills. The DIET-GFD global assessment is reported using a 10-point ordinal descriptive scale, ranging from 1 (takes few precautions and regularly eats gluten) to 10 (no gluten in kitchen and rarely eats food prepared outside the home). The kappa of DIET-GFD global assessment was 0.845, which indicates excellent agreement. Conclusions DIET-GFD is a useful tool for dietitians to evaluate GFD adherence. Further studies are needed to confirm that the score from the DIET-GFD is reliable across various settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nut.2020.110819

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Pekki, 2015, Predictors and Significance of Incomplete Mucosal Recovery in Celiac Disease After 1 Year on a Gluten-Free Diet, Am J Gastroenterol, 110, 1078, 10.1038/ajg.2015.155 · DOI
  2. Galli, 2014, Histological recovery and gluten-free diet adherence: a prospective 1-year follow-up study of adult patients with coeliac disease, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 40, 639, 10.1111/apt.12893 · DOI
  3. Kelly, 2015, Advances in Diagnosis and Management of Celiac Disease, Gastroenterology, 148, 1175, 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.01.044 · DOI
  4. Lebwohl, 2013, Mucosal healing and risk for lymphoproliferative malignancy in celiac disease: a population-based cohort study, Ann Intern Med, 159, 169, 10.7326/0003-4819-159-3-201308060-00006 · DOI
  5. Leffler, 2009, A validated disease-specific symptom index for adults with celiac disease, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 7, 1328, 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.07.031 · DOI
  6. Tau, 2006, Bone mineral density in children with celiac disease, Effect of a Gluten-free diet. Eur J Clin Nutr, 60, 358
  7. Freeman, 2009, Adult celiac disease and its malignant complications, Gut Liver, 3, 237, 10.5009/gnl.2009.3.4.237 · DOI
  8. Lee, 2017, Effect of clinical and laboratory parameters on quality of life in celiac patients using celiac disease-specific quality of life scores, Scand J Gastroenterol, 52, 1235, 10.1080/00365521.2017.1350283 · DOI
  9. Cossu, 2017, Coeliac disease and psychiatric comorbidity: epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, quality-of-life, and gluten-free diet effects, Int Rev Psychiatry, 29, 489, 10.1080/09540261.2017.1314952 · DOI
  10. White, 2016, Coeliac disease and the gluten-free diet: a review of the burdens; factors associated with adherence and impact on health-related quality of life, with specific focus on adolescence, J Hum Nutr Diet, 29, 593, 10.1111/jhn.12375 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Shah, 2014, Patient perception of treatment burden is high in celiac disease compared with other common conditions, Am J Gastroenterol, 109, 1304, 10.1038/ajg.2014.29 · DOI
  12. Rubio-Tapia, 2013, ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease, Am J Gastroenterol, 108, 656, 10.1038/ajg.2013.79 · DOI
  13. Dewar, 2012, Celiac disease: management of persistent symptoms in patients on a gluten-free diet, World J Gastroenterol, 18, 1348, 10.3748/wjg.v18.i12.1348 · DOI
  14. Leffler, 2009, A simple validated gluten-free diet adherence survey for adults with celiac disease, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 7, 530, 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.12.032 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Leffler, 2007, Etiologies and predictors of diagnosis in nonresponsive celiac disease, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 5, 445, 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.12.006 · DOI
  16. Abdulkarim, 2002, Etiology of nonresponsive celiac disease: results of a systematic approach, Am J Gastroenterol, 97, 2016, 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05917.x · DOI
  17. Högberg, 2003, Better Dietary Compliance in Patients with Coeliac Disease Diagnosed in Early Childhood, Scand J Gastroenterol, 38, 751, 10.1080/00365520310003318 · DOI
  18. Ciacci, 2002, Long-Term Follow-Up of Celiac Adults on Gluten-Free Diet: Prevalence and Correlates of Intestinal Damage, Digestion, 66, 178, 10.1159/000066757 · DOI
  19. Moreno, 2017, Detection of gluten immunogenic peptides in the urine of patients with coeliac disease reveals transgressions in the gluten-free diet and incomplete mucosal healing, Gut, 66, 250, 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310148 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Comino, 2012, Monitoring of gluten-free diet compliance in celiac patients by assessment of gliadin 33-mer equivalent epitopes in feces, Am J Clin Nutr, 95, 670, 10.3945/ajcn.111.026708 · DOI
  21. Silvester, 2015, Is it gluten-free?, Relationship between self-reported gluten-free diet adherence and knowledge of gluten content of foods. Nutrition, 32, 777
  22. Silvester, 2017, Tests for Serum Transglutaminase and Endomysial Antibodies Do Not Detect Most Patients With Celiac Disease and Persistent Villous Atrophy on Gluten-free Diets: a Meta-analysis, Gastroenterology, 153, 689, 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.015 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Hall, 2009, Systematic review: adherence to a gluten-free diet in adult patients with coeliac disease, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 30, 315, 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04053.x · DOI
  24. Simpson, 2012, Nutrition assessment in celiac disease, Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 22, 797, 10.1016/j.giec.2012.07.010 · DOI
  25. Silvester, 2016, Symptomatic suspected gluten exposure is common among patients with coeliac disease on a gluten-free diet, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 44, 612, 10.1111/apt.13725 · DOI
  26. Biagi, 2012, A score that verifies adherence to a gluten-free diet: a cross-sectional, multicentre validation in real clinical life, Br J Nutr, 108, 1884, 10.1017/S0007114511007367 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Landis, 1997, The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data Published by : International Biometric Society Stable, 33, 159
  28. Suchy, 2005, National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Celiac Disease, June 28-30, 2004, Gastroenterology, 128, S1, 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.02.007 · DOI
  29. Biagi, 2009, A gluten-free diet score to evaluate dietary compliance in patients with coeliac disease, Br J Nutr, 102, 882, 10.1017/S0007114509301579 · DOI
  30. 31. Wessels MMS, te Lintelo M, Vriezinga SL, Putter H, Hopman EG, Mearin ML. Assessment of dietary compliance in celiac children using a standardized dietary interview. Clin Nutr 2017:1–5. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Atsawarungruangkit, A., Silvester, J. A., Weiten, D., Green, K. L., Wilkey, K. E., Rigaux, L. N., Bernstein, C. N., Graff, L. A., Walker, J. R., & Duerksen, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • St. Boniface Hospital (CA)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Silvester, Jocelyn A.
Venue
Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
78
Pages
110819
ISSN
0899-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3012861469
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Celiac Association
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Institutes of Health (K23 DK119584, T32 DK 07760)
  • Harvard Medical School
  • Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
  • Takeda Canada
  • Takeda Pharmaceutical Company
  • Janssen Canada
  • Pfizer Canada
  • Manitoba Health Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
gluten-free diet adherence, celiac disease, expert consensus, interobserver agreement, dietary habits
MeSH terms
Celiac Disease, Food, Glutens, Humans, Patient Compliance, Diet, Gluten-Free, Nutritionists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review