Cited by 146Virus-based gene therapy researchProtein purification and stabilityViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects

Universal Method for the Purification of Recombinant AAV Vectors of Differing Serotypes

Open access
Nass, Shelley A., Mattingly, Maryellen A., Woodcock, Denise A., Burnham, Brenda L., Ardinger, Jeffrey A., Osmond, Shayla E., Frederick, Amy M., Scaria, Abraham +2 more·2018·Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development

Abstract

The generation of clinical good manufacturing practices (GMP)-grade adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors requires purification strategies that support the generation of vectors of high purity, and that exhibit a good safety and efficacy profile. To date, most reported purification schemas are serotype dependent, requiring method development for each AAV gene therapy product. Here, we describe a platform purification process that is compatible with the purification of multiple AAV serotypes. The method generates vector preparations of high purity that are enriched for capsids with full vector genomes, and that minimizes the fractional content of empty capsids. The two-column purification method, a combination of affinity and ion exchange chromatographies, is compatible with a range of AAV serotypes generated by either the transient triple transfection method or the more scalable producer cell line platform. In summary, the adaptable purification method described can be used for the production of a variety of high-quality AAV vectors suitable for preclinical testing in animal models of diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.omtm.2017.12.004

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nass, S. A., Mattingly, M. A., Woodcock, D. A., Burnham, B. L., Ardinger, J. A., Osmond, S. E., Frederick, A. M., Scaria, A., Cheng, S. H., & O’Riordan, C. R.
Corresponding author
O’Riordan, Catherine R.
Venue
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
9
Pages
33-46
ISSN
2329-0501 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2781108704
Cited by
146
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical Development (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Sanofi
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Keywords
adeno-associated virus vectors, AAV serotypes, vector purification, affinity chromatography, ion-exchange chromatography, producer cell lines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review