Cited by 5Retinal Development and DisordersCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringVirus-based gene therapy research

Rescue of the disease-associated phenotype in CRISPR-corrected hiPSCs as a therapeutic approach for inherited retinal dystrophies

Open access
Siles, Laura, Pomares, Esther·2025·Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids

Abstract

Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs), such as retinitis pigmentosa and Stargardt disease, are a group of rare diseases caused by mutations in more than 300 genes that currently have no treatment in most cases. They commonly trigger blindness and other ocular affectations due to retinal cell degeneration. Gene editing has emerged as a promising and powerful strategy for the development of IRD therapies, allowing the permanent correction of pathogenic variants. Using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9 and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN) gene-editing tools, we precisely corrected seven hiPS cell lines derived from IRD patients carrying mutations in ABCA4 , BEST1 , PDE6A , PDE6C , RHO, or USH2A . Homozygous mutations and point insertions/deletions resulted in the highest homology-directed repair efficiencies, with at least half of the clones repaired properly without off-target effects. Strikingly, correction of a heterozygous pathogenic variant was achieved using the wild-type allele of the patient as the template for DNA repair. These results suggest the unexpected potential application of CRISPR as a donor template-free strategy for single-nucleotide modifications. Additionally, the corrected clones exhibited a reversion of the disease-associated phenotype in retinal cellular models. These data strengthen the study and application of gene editing-based approaches for IRD treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102482

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On-target defects were significantly lower than those obtained in hiPSCs, ranging from 2% to 14.29%, compared with nearly 40% reported in hiPSCs.

    “Importantly, on-target defects were significantly lower than those obtained in hiPSCs, ranging from 2% to 14.29%, compared with nearly 40% reported in hiPSCs [36].”

    From Precise CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas12 Correction Using Lipoplexes in Retinal Models Derived from Patients with Inherited Retinal Dystrophies (2026) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Results section (page unavailable) reports on-target aberrations below 40% in all assays, which supports the claim's approximate hiPSC benchmark. It does not report a 2%–14.29% range or a statistically significant comparison with another group; the assays described were themselves conducted in hiPSCs. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The gene editing outcomes in Experiment A are consistent with previous reports in hiPSCs using the same sgRNA, which showed cleavage of both mutant and wild-type alleles.

    “These results are consistent with previous reports in hiPSCs using the same sgRNA, which showed cleavage of both mutant and wild-type alleles [36].”

    From Precise CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas12 Correction Using Lipoplexes in Retinal Models Derived from Patients with Inherited Retinal Dystrophies (2026) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Results section (‘Precise HDR correction of pathogenic variants by using the endogenous sister chromatid’; page unavailable) reports editing consistent with cleavage of both mutant and wild-type alleles in hiPSCs, particularly with sgRNAs having one mismatch to the wild-type allele. The claim that the prior report used the same sgRNA as Experiment A cannot be verified from the supplied claim and our copy, which do not identify Experiment A’s guide. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • All predicted off-target sites located within exonic regions or intronic regions in close proximity to exons were analyzed by Sanger sequencing.

    “All predicted off-target sites located within exonic regions or intronic regions in close proximity to exons were analyzed by Sanger sequencing, following the same criteria as previously reported studies [36,40,41].”
  • Cas9 sgRNAs and ssODNs were previously designed and validated.

    “Cas9 sgRNAs and ssODNs were previously designed and validated (Thermo Fisher Scientific) [36].”
  • In this study, several gene-edited clones exhibited cleavage of the wild-type allele followed by repair using the sister chromatid rather than the exogenous ssODN.

    “In this study, several gene-edited clones exhibited cleavage the wild-type allele followed by repair using the sister chromatid rather than the exogenous ssODN, as reported previously [36].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 117 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siles, L., & Pomares, E.
Affiliations
Instituto de Microcirugía Ocular (ES)
Corresponding author
Pomares, Esther
Venue
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-03
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
102482
ISSN
2162-2531 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407380873
Cited by
4
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
Keywords
inherited retinal disease, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, induced pluripotent stem cells, retinitis pigmentosa, Stargardt disease, ABCA4, BEST1, PDE6A, PDE6C, Rho, USH2A, homology-directed repair, heterozygous pathogenic variant, retinal degeneration, gene therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review