Cited by 180Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal and Macular SurgeryRetinopathy of Prematurity Studies

Outcomes of Eyes Lost to Follow-up with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy That Received Panretinal Photocoagulation versus Intravitreal Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

Open access
Obeid, Anthony, Su, Daniel, Patel, Samir N., Uhr, Joshua H., Borkar, Durga, Gao, Xinxiao, Fineman, Mitchell S., Regillo, Carl D. +3 more·2019·Ophthalmology

Abstract

Purpose To compare anatomic and functional outcomes in eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) that were lost to follow-up (LTFU) for more than 6 months after treatment with either intravitreal injection (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents or panretinal photocoagulation (PRP).Design Retrospective cohort study.Participants Fifty-nine patients who were LTFU immediately after treatment for more than 6 months between September 2013 and September 2016.Methods Patients with eyes receiving either intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment or PRP with the next follow-up visit occurring more than 6 months after treatment were identified. Visual acuity (VA) and anatomic outcomes at the visit before being LTFU, the return visit, the 6-month visit after return, the 12-month visit after return, and the final visit were gathered and compared between the 2 treatment groups.Main outcomes measures Visual acuity and anatomic outcomes.Results Seventy-six eyes of 59 patients were included in the study, of which 30 received IVI with anti-VEGF and 46 received PRP. In the anti-VEGF group, mean VA worsened significantly when comparing the visit before being LTFU (0.43±0.38 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) with the return visit (0.97±0.80 logMAR; P = 0.001) as well as with the final visit (0.92±0.94 logMAR; P = 0.01). In the PRP group, mean VA worsened significantly when comparing the visit before being LTFU (0.42±0.34 logMAR) with the return visit (0.62±0.64 logMAR; P = 0.03). However, no significant difference was observed at the final visit (0.46±0.47 logMAR; P = 0.38). There was a significantly greater number of eyes with tractional retinal detachment in the IVI group compared with the PRP group at the final visit (10 vs. 1, respectively; P = 0.005). There was a significantly greater incidence of neovascularization of the iris in the IVI arm compared with the PRP arm at the final visit (4 vs. 0, respectively; P = 0.02).Conclusions Eyes with PDR that received only intravitreal anti-VEGF demonstrated worse anatomic and functional outcomes after being LTFU compared with eyes that received PRP. Given the potential sequelae of being LTFU, the choice of treatment for PDR must be considered carefully.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.07.027

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and fibrates may have specific benefit in diabetic retinopathy.

    “In addition, pharmacologic treatment approaches may have specific benefit in diabetic retinopathy, including ACE inhibitors, ARBs,529,530 and fibrate lipid-lowering agents.531–533”

    From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [533]

    The Discussion (pp. 3, 5–6) addresses intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy, not the drug classes named in the claim. Searches for ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and fibrates found no passage in our copy assessing their benefit for diabetic retinopathy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]2. [The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Clinical application of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS) fi ndings, DRS report number 8. Ophthalmology . 1981;88:583 e 600.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0161-6420(18)31079-0/sref2)
  2. [5]5. [Sivaprasad S, Prevost AT, Vasconcelos JC, et al. Clinical ef fi cacy of intravitreal a fl ibercept versus panretinal photocoagulation for best corrected visual acuity in patients with](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0161-6420(18)31079-0/sref5)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Obeid, A., Su, D., Patel, S. N., Uhr, J. H., Borkar, D., Gao, X., Fineman, M. S., Regillo, C. D., Maguire, J. I., Garg, S. J., & Hsu, J.
Affiliations
Mid Atlantic Retina (US)
Corresponding author
Hsu, Jason
Venue
Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
126
Issue
3
Pages
407-413
ISSN
0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2886506590
Cited by
180
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2
FWCI
15.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies
Keywords
proliferative diabetic retinopathy, loss to follow-up, panretinal photocoagulation, intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy, visual acuity outcomes, tractional retinal detachment, iris neovascularization
MeSH terms
Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab, Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Retinopathy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Retrospective Studies, Visual Acuity, Retinal Neovascularization, Treatment Outcome, Laser Coagulation, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Intravitreal Injections, Lost to Follow-Up

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review