Cited by 136Obesity, Physical Activity, DietEating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity and Health Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The relationship between abdominal obesity and depression in the general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Xu, Qunyan, Anderson, Debra, Lurie-Beck, Janine·2011·Obesity Research & Clinical Practice

Abstract

Summary Obesity has been widely regarded as a public health concern because of its adverse impact on individuals' health. Systematic reviews have been published in examining the effect of obesity on depression, but with major emphasis on general obesity as measured by the body mass index. Despite a stronger effect of abdominal obesity on individuals' physical health outcomes, to our best knowledge, no systematic review was undertaken with regard to the relationship between abdominal obesity and depression. This paper reports the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies examining the relationship between abdominal obesity and depression in a general population. Multiple electronic databases were searched until the end of September 2009. 15 articles were systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed. The analysis showed that the odds ratio of having depression for individuals with abdominal obesity was 1.38 (95% CI, 1.22-1.57) as compared to those who are not obese. Furthermore, it was found that this relationship did not vary with potential confounders including gender, age, measurement of depression and abdominal obesity, and study quality.:

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.orcp.2011.04.007

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Xu, Q., Anderson, D., & Lurie-Beck, J.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Xu, Qunyan
Venue
Obesity Research & Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
e267-e278
ISSN
1871-403X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164957626
Cited by
136
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity Research & Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
abdominal obesity, depression, visceral fat, body mass index, general population, mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review