Cited by 41Obesity, Physical Activity, DietEating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity and Health Practices

Gender differences in the association between adiposity and probable major depression: a cross-sectional study of 140,564 UK Biobank participants

Open access
Ul-Haq, Zia, Smith, Daniel J, Nicholl, Barbara I, Cullen, Breda, Martin, Daniel, Gill, Jason MR, Evans, Jonathan, Roberts, Beverly +6 more·2014·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on the association between adiposity and mood disorder have produced contradictory results, and few have used measurements other than body mass index (BMI). We examined the association between probable major depression and several measurements of adiposity: BMI, waist circumference (WC), waist-hip-ratio (WHR), and body fat percentage (BF%). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using baseline data on the sub-group of UK Biobank participants who were assessed for mood disorder. Multivariate logistic regression models were used, adjusting for potential confounders including: demographic and life-style factors, comorbidity and psychotropic medication. RESULTS: Of the 140,564 eligible participants, evidence of probable major depression was reported by 30,145 (21.5%). The fully adjusted odds ratios (OR) for obese participants were 1.16 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12, 1.20) using BMI, 1.15 (95% CI 1.11, 1.19) using WC, 1.09 (95% CI 1.05, 1.13) using WHR and 1.18 (95% CI 1.12, 1.25) using BF% (all p < 0.001). There was a significant interaction between adiposity and gender (p = 0.001). Overweight women were at increased risk of depression with a dose response relationship across the overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m2), obese I (30.0-34.9 kg/m2), II (35.0-39.9 kg/m2) and III (≥40.0 kg/m2) categories; fully adjusted ORs 1.14, 1.20, 1.29 and 1.48, respectively (all p < 0.001). In contrast, only obese III men had significantly increased risk of depression (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.08, 1.54, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Adiposity was associated with probable major depression, irrespective of the measurement used. The association was stronger in women than men. Physicians managing overweight and obese women should be alert to this increased risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-244x-14-153

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adiposity serves as a better predictor of depression than body weight in women than in men.

    “Adiposity serves as a better predictor of depression than body weight in women than in men [149].”

    From The menace of obesity to depression and anxiety prevalence (2022) · cites this paper as [149]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ul-Haq, Z., Smith, D. J., Nicholl, B. I., Cullen, B., Martin, D., Gill, J. M., Evans, J., Roberts, B., Deary, I. J., Gallacher, J., Hotopf, M., Craddock, N., Mackay, D. F., & Pell, J. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Pell, Jill P
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2014-05-26
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
153-153
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097825531
Cited by
41
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (093707)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • British Heart Foundation
  • Northwest Regional Development Agency
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K026992/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
major depressive disorder, adiposity, obesity, overweight, sex differences, body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, body fat percentage, mood disorders, women's mental health
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Composition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Sex Characteristics, Comorbidity, Body Mass Index, Logistic Models, Biological Specimen Banks, Waist-Hip Ratio, Adiposity, Waist Circumference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review