Cited by 166Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesCleft Lip and Palate Research

Anterior Septal Reconstruction: Outcomes After a Modified Extracorporeal Septoplasty Technique

Most, Sam P.·2006·Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery

Abstract

Objective: To describe a modified extracorporeal septoplasty technique and measure its efficacy with a validated quality-of-life instrument. Design: A prospective observational outcomes study of patients with severe septal deviation who subsequently underwent anterior septal reconstruction. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation was performed using photographs and the Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation scale. Results: Twelve consecutive patients were enrolled. No complications occurred. All patients noted improved airway function postoperatively. There was a significant improvement in mean Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation score postoperatively (76.6 vs 12.9; P <.01). Examination of postoperative photographs revealed improved midvault and tip anatomy. Conclusions: The anterior septal reconstruction technique is effective in improving both nasal airway function and aesthetics in patients with severe septonasal deviation. The technique avoids the most common complication of standard extracorporeal septoplasty by preserving the dorsal strut of septal cartilage and its attachment to the nasal bones at the keystone area.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archfaci.8.3.202

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Extracorporeal septoplasty is a method to reconstruct severe caudal septal deviations.

    “Extracorporeal septoplasty, first described by Peer and later popularized by Gubisch, is a method to reconstruct severe caudal septal deviations.13,[17][18][19]”
  • Anterior septal reconstruction is convenient for saving the nasal keystone region and provides a dorsal strut for a stable septal foundation.

    “The anterior septal reconstruction (ASR) is convenient for saving the valued nasal keystone region, the bone and cartilage junction of the upper and middle thirds of the nose, providing a dorsal strut for a stable septal foundation.13,14”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Most, S. P.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Most, Sam P.
Venue
Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery
Published
2006-05-01
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
202-207
ISSN
  • 1521-2491 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3660
OpenAlex
W2141630784
Cited by
166
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Keywords
extracorporeal septoplasty, septal deviation, nasal obstruction, nasal airway function, nasal aesthetics, nasal tip
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Esthetics, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nasal Septum, Nose Deformities, Acquired, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Rhinoplasty, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review