Associations of trait and ability emotional intelligence with performance on theory of mind tasks in an adult sample
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Eyes Test scores show convergent validity evidence with other ToM measures, specifically scores from the Strange Stories Test and the Faux Pas Test.
“The results of several studies suggest that the Eyes Test scores show convergent validity evidence with other ToM measures, specifically scores from the Strange Stories Test and the Faux Pas Test (Torralva et al., 2009; Ferguson and Austin, 2010; Kirkland et al., 2012a), however, others have found no relation (Ahmed and Miller, 2011; Duval et al., 2011).”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Ferguson and Austin, 2010
Cites
Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00076512 · Cited by 8,743 · see citing works
Baron‐Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00715 · Cited by 4,555 · see citing works
Human abilities: emotional intelligence
Mayer, J. D., Roberts, R. D., & Barsade, S. G. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093646 · Cited by 2,170 · see citing works
Convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity of competing measures of emotional intelligence
Brackett, M. A., & Mayer, J. D. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167203254596 · Cited by 1,351 · see citing works
Measuring empathy: reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient
LAWRENCE, E. J., SHAW, P., BAKER, D., BARON-COHEN, S., & DAVID, A. S. (2004) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291703001624 · Cited by 1,014 · see citing works
Mavroveli, S., Petrides, K. V., Rieffe, C., & Bakker, F. (2007) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1348/026151006x118577 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Olderbak, S., Wilhelm, O., Olaru, G., Geiger, M., Brenneman, M. W., & Roberts, R. D. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01503 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Baker, C. A., Peterson, E., Pulos, S., & Kirkland, R. A. (2014) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2014.03.001 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
The eyes test as a measure of individual differences: how much of the variance reflects verbal IQ?
Peterson, E., & Miller, S. F. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00220 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ferguson, F. J., & Austin, E. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Austin, Elizabeth J.
- ORCID
- Austin, Elizabeth J.
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 414-418
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082121141
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 10.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Social Skills and Education
- Keywords
- emotional intelligence, theory of mind, trait emotional intelligence, ability emotional intelligence, social cognition, social perception, verbal ability, agreeableness, openness to experience, emotional understanding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review