The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Moral disengagement, the dark triad, and unethical consumer attitudes
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, narcissists have been found to more lightheartedly excuse their immoral acts (Egan, Hughes, & Palmer, 2015) and to ignore conventional behavioral rules such as following their boss’s instructions in the workplace (Judge et al., 2006).”
From The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit (2020) · cites this paper as Egan, Hughes, & Palmer, 2015
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Indeed, a factor analytic study showed a stronger clustering of psychopathy and Machiavellianism with other variables (e.g., moral disengagement, unethical attitudes, and disagreeableness) capturing antisocial variance, whereas narcissism was much stronger associated with a non-antisocial factor alongside traits such as extraversion and intellect (11).”
From Empathy at the heart of darkness: empathy deficits that bind the dark triad and those that mediate indirect relational aggression. (2019) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
An Introduction to the Five‐Factor Model and Its Applications
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x · Cited by 6,835
The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6 · Cited by 5,265
O’connor, B. P. (2000) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03200807 · Cited by 4,116
The self-importance of moral identity
Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423 · Cited by 3,522
(1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,151
Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364 · Cited by 2,680
Personality Psychology in Europe
Vera-Bermudez, J., Raad, D. B., de Vries, J., García, A. M. P., Sanchez-Elvita, A., & Heck, G. V. (1997) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 2,462
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Ritter, N. (2012). A comparison of distribution-free and non-distribution free methods in factor analysis. Paper presented at Southwestern Educational Research Association (SERA) Conference 2012, New Orleans, LA (ED529153). Downloaded from: http://www.academia.edu/1713092/A_Comparison_of_Distribution_Free_and_Non-distribution_Free_Factor_Analysis_Methods June 2013.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Otgaar, H., & Meijer, E. (2017) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616666070 · Cited by 946
Moore, C. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.018 · Cited by 326
The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit
Grapsas, S., Brummelman, E., Back, M. D., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619873350 · Cited by 312
Investigating When and Why Psychological Entitlement Predicts Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior
Lee, A., Schwarz, G., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3456-z · Cited by 300
The Dark Triad and Workplace Behavior
LeBreton, J. M., Shiverdecker, L. K., & Grimaldi, E. M. (2017) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104451 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Egan, V., Hughes, N., & Palmer, E. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- University of Leicester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Egan, Vincent
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 76
- Pages
- 123-128
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052021119
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 11.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
- Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Keywords
- moral disengagement, Dark Triad, antisocial behavior, psychopathy, Machiavellianism, narcissism, agreeableness, conscientiousness, personality traits, incremental validity, consumer ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
