Cited by 320Personality Traits and PsychologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsMental Health via Writing

The Big Five, self-esteem, and narcissism as predictors of the topics people write about in Facebook status updates

Open access
Marshall, Tara C., Lefringhausen, Katharina, Ferenczi, Nelli·2015·Personality and Individual Differences

Abstract

Status updates are one of the most popular features of Facebook, but few studies have examined the traits and motives that influence the topics that people choose to update about. In this study, 555 Facebook users completed measures of the Big Five, self-esteem, narcissism, motives for using Facebook, and frequency of updating about a range of topics. Results revealed that extraverts more frequently updated about their social activities and everyday life, which was motivated by their use of Facebook to communicate and connect with others. People high in openness were more likely to update about intellectual topics, consistent with their use of Facebook for sharing information. Participants who were low in self-esteem were more likely to update about romantic partners, whereas those who were high in conscientiousness were more likely to update about their children. Narcissists’ use of Facebook for attention-seeking and validation explained their greater likelihood of updating about their accomplishments and their diet and exercise routine. Furthermore, narcissists’ tendency to update about their accomplishments explained the greater number of likes and comments that they reported receiving to their updates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.039

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Online, narcissists try to stand out by dominating social-media newsfeeds with frequent posts about exercise, diets, and personal achievements.

    “Online, narcissists might similarly try to stand out by dominating social-media newsfeeds with frequent posts of their exercise habits, diets, and personal achievements (Marshall, Lefringhausen, & Ferenczi, 2015; McCain & Campbell, 2016).”

    From The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit (2020) · cites this paper as Marshall, Lefringhausen, & Ferenczi, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marshall, T. C., Lefringhausen, K., & Ferenczi, N.
Affiliations
Brunel University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Marshall, Tara C.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
85
Pages
35-40
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1493961864
Cited by
320
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 5
FWCI
38.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
Facebook status updates, Big Five personality traits, self-esteem, narcissism, extraversion, openness to experience, conscientiousness, motivations for social media use, attention seeking, validation seeking, romantic relationships, achievement, likes and comments, social media self-disclosure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review