Cited by 24Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMedia and Digital CommunicationPersonality Traits and Psychology

Interpersonal goals as predictors of facebook use, social capital, and envy

Open access
Tobin, Stephanie J., Chant, Grace, Clay, Rhiannon·2020·Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking

Abstract

This study sought to examine whether interpersonal goals can help us understand who engages in social-capital-building responsive behaviors and envy-eliciting passive behaviors on Facebook. One hundred eighty-eight adults completed measures of interpersonal goals (compassionate and self-image), Facebook use (posting, responding, and searching), social capital sources and benefits, social comparison, and envy, along with various control measures. Serial mediation analyses revealed that compassionate goals significantly predicted four distinct social capital benefits (offline participation, emotional support, horizon broadening, and networking value) through greater Facebook responding and sources of social capital. Furthermore, self-image goals significantly predicted envy through greater Facebook searching and social comparison. These effects were significant with and without controlling for age, gender, Facebook friends, Facebook frequency, Facebook hours, self-esteem, attachment style, social desirability, and the other interpersonal goal and Facebook behaviors. Consistent with research on interpersonal goals in offline interactions, compassionate goals predicted more responsive behaviors and better social outcomes, while self-image goals predicted a competitive mindset and negative emotion. These findings extend the social networking site (SNS) literature by identifying a relevant new individual difference associated with SNS use and key outcomes related to well-being.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2019.0446

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The link between social media use and well-being may be moderated by an individual's personality characteristics.

    “the link between social media use and well-being may be moderated by an individual's personality characteristics (Sheldon et al., 2021; Tobin et al., 2020)”

    From Social media use and systemic inflammation: The moderating role of self-esteem (2021) · cites this paper as Tobin et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Koroleva K, Krasnova H, Veltri N, Günther O. (2011) It's all about networking! Empirical investigation of social capital formation on social network sites. Thirty Second International Conference on Information Systems. Shanghai.
  2. Krasnova H, Wenninger H, Widjaja T, Buxmann P. (2013) Envy on Facebook: A hidden threat to users' life satisfaction? 11th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik. Leipzig, Germany.
  3. Panek E, Nardis Y, Auverset L. It's all about me (or us): Facebook post frequency and focus as related to narcissism. The Journal of Social Media in Society 2018; 7:1-17.
  4. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. (2013) Using Multivariate Statistics: Pearson New International Edition. Harlow, United Kingdom: Pearson.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tobin, S. J., Chant, G., & Clay, R.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
Corresponding author
Tobin, Stephanie J.
Venue
Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking
Published
2020-04-01
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
257-263
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W3008476091
Cited by
24
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
interpersonal goals, compassionate goals, self-image goals, Facebook use, social capital, envy, social comparison, social networking sites, emotional support, individual differences, well-being
MeSH terms
Adult, Empathy, Female, Goals, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Jealousy, Male, Motivation, Self Concept, Social Desirability, Friends, Social Networking, Social Media, Social Capital

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review