Between universalistic and defensive forms of group attachment. The indirect effects of national identification on intergroup forgiveness
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Collective narcissists are unable to forgive others for wrongs done to the ingroup.
“Together with results that indicate that collective narcissists are unable to forgive others for wrongs done to the ingroup (Golec de Zavala et al., 2009;Hamer, Penczek, & Bilewicz, 2018), such results link collective narcissism to revenge seeking in intergroup relations.”
From Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image (2019) · cites this paper as Hamer, Penczek, & Bilewicz, 2018
Cites
Toward a Measure of Patriotic and Nationalistic Attitudes
Kosterman, R., & Feshbach, S. (1989) · Political Psychology · doi:10.2307/3791647 · Cited by 1,225 · see citing works
Understanding defensive and secure in-group positivity: The role of collective narcissism
Cichocka, A. (2016) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2016.1252530 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Lyons, P. A., Kenworthy, J. B., & Popan, J. R. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167210380604 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Hanke, K., Liu, J. H., Hilton, D. J., Bilewicz, M., Garber, I., Huang, L.-L., Gastardo-Conaco, C., & Wang, F. (2013) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.05.003 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image
Golec de Zavala, A., Dyduch‐Hazar, K., & Lantos, D. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12569 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Nationalism as collective narcissism
Cichocka, A., & Cislak, A. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.12.013 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hamer, K., Penczek, M., & Bilewicz, M.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Psychology (PL)
- Uniwersytet SWPS (PL)
- University of Warsaw (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Hamer, Katarzyna
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 131
- Pages
- 15-20
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2796934196
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 8.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- ReIn UW (University of Warsaw) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Polish National Science Centre (2014/14/M/HS6/00914, 2011/01/N/HS6/06509, DEC-2014/15/G/HS6/04589)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Keywords
- national identification, intergroup forgiveness, reconciliation, group attachment, collective narcissism, personal identification, blind patriotism, constructive patriotism, sense of belonging, openness to others, Polish adults
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
