Cited by 278Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionPersonality Traits and Psychology

Understanding defensive and secure in-group positivity: The role of collective narcissism

Cichocka, Aleksandra·2016·European Review of Social Psychology

Abstract

Integrating psychoanalytic ideas of group idealisation with social identity and categorisation theories, this article discusses the distinction between secure and defensive in-group positivity. Narcissistic in-group positivity captures a belief in in-group greatness that is contingent on external validation. It reflects defensive in-group positivity, insofar as it stems from the frustration of individual needs, and predicts increased sensitivity to threats as well as undesirable consequences for out-groups and the in-group. Secure in-group positivity—that is, in-group positivity without the narcissistic component—is a confidently held positive evaluation of one’s in-group that is independent of the recognition of the group in the eyes of others. It stems from the satisfaction of individual needs, is resilient to threats and has positive consequences for the in-group and out-groups. I review evidence for these two distinct ways people relate to their social groups and discuss theoretical and practical implications for understanding intra- and intergroup relations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10463283.2016.1252530

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cichocka, A.
Affiliations
University of Kent (GB)
Corresponding author
Cichocka, Aleksandra
Venue
European Review of Social Psychology
Published
2016-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
283-317
ISSN
  • 1046-3283 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-277X
OpenAlex
W2566484759
Cited by
278
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 6
FWCI
53.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Review of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Narodowe Centrum Nauki (2014/13/B/HS6/03137, 2011/01/B/HS6/04637)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
collective narcissism, social identity, categorization, intergroup relations, threat sensitivity, individual needs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review