Cited by 44Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsPersonality Traits and Psychology

An examination of psychosocial factors associated with malicious online trolling behaviors

Howard, Krista, Zolnierek, Kelly Haskard, Critz, Kirstin, Dailey, Stephanie, Ceballos, Natalie·2019·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.020

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Howard, K., Zolnierek, K. H., Critz, K., Dailey, S., & Ceballos, N.
Affiliations
Texas State University (US)
Corresponding author
Howard, Krista
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
149
Pages
309-314
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2951493499
Cited by
44
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
trolling, psychosocial predictors, social media use, university students, gender differences, downward social comparison, online harassment prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review