Cited by 919Personality Traits and PsychologyBullying, Victimization, and AggressionHumor Studies and Applications

Trolls just want to have fun

Buckels, Erin E., Trapnell, Paul D., Paulhus, Delroy L.·2014·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • The University of Winnipeg (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Buckels, Erin E.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
67
Pages
97-102
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970593207
Cited by
919
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 12
FWCI
71.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Humor Studies and Applications
Keywords
trolling, sadism, Dark Tetrad, psychopathy, Machiavellianism, online commenting, personality traits, online behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review