Cited by 196Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Are prognostic indicators for poor outcome different for acute and chronic low back pain consulters in primary care?

Open access
Grotle, Margreth, Foster, Nadine E., Dunn, Kate M., Croft, Peter·2010·Pain

Abstract

Few studies have investigated whether prognostic indicators, which contribute to the transition from acute to chronic low back pain (LBP), are also those which contribute to continuing persistence of chronic LBP. We compared the contribution of physical, psychological and social indicators to predicting disability after one year between consulters with LBP of less than 3 months duration and more than 3 months duration. Data from two large prospective cohort studies of consecutive patients consulting with LBP in general practices were merged, providing complete data for 258 cases with acute/subacute LBP and 668 cases with chronic LBP at 12 months follow-up. There were significant differences between the two LBP groups in baseline characteristics and clinical course of disability, assessed by Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, during the year of follow-up. Adjusted associations between potential prognostic indicators and disability at 12months were carried out in the two LBP subgroups. The final multivariable regression models showed that being non-employed, having widespread pain, a high level of Chronic Pain Grade, and catastrophising were the strongest prognostic indicators for disability at 12 months in both LBP groups. Fear of pain was significantly associated with disability in chronic LBP. Importantly, beyond baseline disability, the effect size of the other prognostic indicators for poor outcome was rather low. These findings must continue to challenge researchers to identify useful early predictors of outcome in persons with disabling back pain, as screening and targeted treatment approaches are dependent upon prognostic indicators with clinical significance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.014

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kinesiophobia is a strong predictor for long-term pain disability and pain chronicity, and is associated with higher rates of sick leave, pain vigilance, disability, and decreased physical activity.

    “It has been demonstrated that kinesiophobia has shown to be a strong predictor for pain disability and pain chronicity in the longer term [73] associated with higher rates of sick-leaves [74], pain vigilance and disability as well as decreased physical activity levels [75–77].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grotle, M., Foster, N. E., Dunn, K. M., & Croft, P.
Affiliations
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Arthritis Research UK (GB)
Corresponding author
Grotle, Margreth
Venue
Pain
Published
2010-12
Volume
151
Issue
3
Pages
790-797
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991490088
Cited by
196
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (083572)
  • Versus Arthritis
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
low back pain, chronic low back pain, acute low back pain, prognostic factors, disability, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, fear of pain, pain catastrophizing, widespread pain, employment status, primary care, outcome prediction
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Chronic Disease, Disability Evaluation, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Low Back Pain, Physicians, Primary Care, Catastrophization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review