Cited by 1,229Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Outcome Measures for Low Back Pain Research: A Proposal for Standardized Use

Deyo, Richard A., Battie, Michele, Beurskens, A. J. H. M., Bombardier, Claire, Croft, Peter, Koes, Bart, Malmivaara, Antti, Roland, Martin +2 more·1998·Spine

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: An international group of back pain researchers considered recommendations for standardized measures in clinical outcomes research in patients with back pain. OBJECTIVES: To promote more standardization of outcome measurement in clinical trials and other types of outcomes research, including meta-analyses, cost-effectiveness analyses, and multicenter studies. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Better standardization of outcome measurement would facilitate comparison of results among studies, and more complete reporting of relevant outcomes. Because back pain is rarely fatal or completely cured, outcome assessment is complex and involves multiple dimensions. These include symptoms, function, general well-being, work disability, and satisfaction with care. METHODS: The panel considered several factors in recommending a standard battery of outcome measures. These included reliability, validity, responsiveness, and practicality of the measures. In addition, compatibility with widely used and promoted batteries such, as the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Lumbar Cluster were considered to minimize the need for changes when these instruments are used. RESULTS: First, a six-item set was proposed, which is sufficiently brief that it could be used in routine care settings for quality improvement and for research purposes. An expanded outcome set, which would provide more precise measurement for research purposes, includes measures of severity and frequency of symptoms, either the Roland or the Oswestry Disability Scale, either the SF-12 or the EuroQol measure of general health status, a question about satisfaction with symptoms, three types of "disability days," and an optional single item on overall satisfaction with medical care. CONCLUSION: Standardized measurement of outcomes would facilitate scientific advances in clinical care. A short, 6-item questionnaire and a somewhat expanded, more precise battery of questionnaires can be recommended. Although many considerations support such recommendations, more data on responsiveness and the minimally important change in scores are needed for most of the instruments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00007632-199809150-00018

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deyo, R. A., Battie, M., Beurskens, A. J. H. M., Bombardier, C., Croft, P., Koes, B., Malmivaara, A., Roland, M., Von Korff, M., & Waddell, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Group Health Cooperative (US)
  • Keele University (GB)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Deyo, Richard A.
Venue
Spine
Published
1998-09
Volume
23
Issue
18
Pages
2003-2013
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145513209
Cited by
1,229
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 70
FWCI
15.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Spine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS 08194)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
low back pain, outcome measures, clinical trials, work disability, disability days, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, symptom severity, Oswestry Disability Index, SF-12, EuroQol, minimally important change, responsiveness
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Low Back Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review