Cited by 79Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Worry and catastrophizing about pain in youth: A reappraisal

Open access
Eccleston, Christopher, Fisher, Emma Alice, Vervoort, Tine, Crombez, Geert·2012·Pain

Abstract

Catastrophizing about pain is defined as “an exaggerated negative ‘mental set’ brought to bear during actual or anticipated pain experience” [25]. It is a salient form of worry, and one that has proven useful in explaining pain severity, disability, and adaptation to treatment in a range of different conditions and settings [7] and [12]. Catastrophizing involves repeated thought about threat as uncontrollable and likely to have awful consequences. These aspects have been captured neatly by Sullivan and colleagues with the labels of “rumination,” “helplessness,” and “magnification” [24]. Catastrophizing was identified as important for children’s adaptation to pain and included in early measurement tools focused on coping [20]. However, interest has been fuelled by the development of the child version of the adult Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the PCS-C [3], [27] and [29]. We suggest that a reappraisal of catastrophic thinking about pain in young people is needed before research blooms. In what follows, we focus on a developmental view of emotional coping, we look again at how catastrophizing about pain has been researched with children, and we suggest an alternative view. Finally, we introduce the research and clinical implications of this reappraisal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2012.02.039

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]19. Piaget J. The child's conception of the world. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1929.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eccleston, C., Fisher, E. A., Vervoort, T., & Crombez, G.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
Eccleston, Christopher
Venue
Pain
Published
2012-08
Volume
153
Issue
8
Pages
1560-1562
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991686823
Cited by
79
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
pain catastrophizing, worry, youth, children, coping, rumination, helplessness, magnification, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, developmental psychology, pain adaptation, pain intensity
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Anxiety, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Pain, Catastrophization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review