Cited by 2,619Statistical Methods and InferenceStatistical Methods and ApplicationsAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models

Variable selection using random forests

Open access
Genuer, Robin, Poggi, Jean-Michel, Tuleau-Malot, Christine·2010·Pattern Recognition Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patrec.2010.03.014

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Genuer, R., Poggi, J.-M., & Tuleau-Malot, C.
Affiliations
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
  • Laboratoire Jean-Alexandre Dieudonné (FR)
Corresponding author
Poggi, Jean-Michel
Venue
Pattern Recognition Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
31
Issue
14
Pages
2225-2236
ISSN
0167-8655 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155261478
Cited by
2,619
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 166 · 2025: 249 · 2024: 248 · 2023: 235 · 2022: 255 · 2021: 280 · 2020: 288 · 2019: 210 · 2018: 167 · 2017: 152 · 2016: 128 · 2015: 94 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 24
FWCI
21.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pattern Recognition Letters (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Keywords
feature selection, random forest, feature importance, feature ranking, stepwise selection, classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review