Cited by 151Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGene expression and cancer classificationGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Patterns of Reliability: Assessing the Reproducibility and Integrity of DNA Methylation Measurement

Open access
Sugden, Karen, Hannon, Eilis J., Arseneault, Louise, Belsky, Daniel W., Corcoran, David L., Fisher, Helen L., Houts, Renate M., Kandaswamy, Radhika +8 more·2020·Patterns

Abstract

DNA methylation plays an important role in both normal human development and risk of disease. The most utilized method of assessing DNA methylation uses BeadChips, generating an epigenome-wide "snapshot" of >450,000 observations (probe measurements) per assay. However, the reliability of each of these measurements is not equal, and little consideration is paid to consequences for research. We correlated repeat measurements of the same DNA samples using the Illumina HumanMethylation450K and the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChips in 350 blood DNA samples. Probes that were reliably measured were more heritable and showed consistent associations with environmental exposures, gene expression, and greater cross-tissue concordance. Unreliable probes were less replicable and generated an unknown volume of false negatives. This serves as a lesson for working with DNA methylation data, but the lessons are equally applicable to working with other data: as we advance toward generating increasingly greater volumes of data, failure to document reliability risks harming reproducibility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patter.2020.100014

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mild correlation among first-generation epigenetic clock age gaps could be due to large technical noise in DNA methylation arrays, which limits robustness across datasets.

    “This could be due to the large degree of technical noise in DNA methylation arrays152–154, which limits the robustness of applying these models across datasets.”

    From Measuring biological age using omics data (2022) · cites this paper as [154]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sugden, K., Hannon, E. J., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D. W., Corcoran, D. L., Fisher, H. L., Houts, R. M., Kandaswamy, R., Moffitt, T. E., Poulton, R., Prinz, J. A., Rasmussen, L. J. H., Williams, B. S., Wong, C. C. Y., Mill, J., & Caspi, A.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Sugden, Karen
Venue
Patterns
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
100014
ISSN
2666-3899 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3011777860
Cited by
151
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patterns (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Royal Devon and Exeter Research Repository (Royal Devon and Exeter) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (MR/P005918/1, G1002190)
  • National Institute on Aging (MR/P005918/1, AG049789, AG032282)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (MQ14F40)
  • British Academy (MD\\170005)
  • Health Research Council of New Zealand
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/N000277/1)
  • North Carolina Biotechnology Center (2016-IDG-1013)
  • American Asthma Foundation
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD077482)
  • Charles Lafitte Foundation
  • Jacobs Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
DNA methylation, measurement reliability, reproducibility, epigenome-wide association study, heritability, environmental exposure, gene expression, blood DNA, false-negative results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review