The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the prevalence of depression between people with and without Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes
Open accessAbstract
Aims Diabetes can significantly impact quality of life and mental health. However, inconsistencies have been reported in the prevalence of depression in those with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, and those without. Systematic reviews also included studies without adequate control subjects. We update existing literature, by comparing depression prevalence between individuals with and without Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes.Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and PSYCHINFO, from January 1985 to August 2021. Studies were excluded if they failed to have an adequate control group, specified type of diabetes, or reported depression prevalence by type of diabetes.Results 44 studies were selected for inclusion. The prevalence of depression was significantly higher in people with Type 1 (22% vs 13%, OR = 2.10 (95% CI: 1.23, 3.52)), or Type 2 diabetes (19% vs 11%, OR = 1.76 (1.55, 2.01)) compared to those without diabetes. There was no association between study effect size and mean age or gender. Findings did not significantly differ between methods of depression assessment. Prevalence of depression in people with diabetes was higher in studies carried out in specialist care (36%, OR = 3.14 (2.12, 4.63)) compared to those in community or primary care (12%, OR = 1.51 (1.35, 1.70) and in low- and middle-income countries (OR = 2.58 (1.91, 3.50) compared to countries with high income economies (OR = 1.59 (1.39, 1.82)).Conclusions Depression prevalence remains significant in those with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Effective chronic disease management in people with diabetes is important, particularly screening and managing depression and diabetes distress in specialist care settings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The point prevalence of MDD is high in both type 1 (22%) and type 2 (19%) diabetes mellitus32.”
From Comorbidity between major depressive disorder and physical diseases: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, mechanisms and management (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“The point prevalence of MDD is high in both type 1 (22%) and type 2 (19%) diabetes mellitus32.”
From Comorbidity between major depressive disorder and physical diseases: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, mechanisms and management (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
(2014) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 17,633
Practical Statistics for Medical Research.
Walter, S., & Altman, D. G. (1992) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532320 · Cited by 11,666
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Higgins, J. P. T., Green, S., & Ben Van Den, A. (2020) · International Coaching Psychology Review · doi:10.53841/bpsicpr.2020.15.2.123 · Cited by 5,670
The Prevalence of Comorbid Depression in Adults With Diabetes
Anderson, R. J., Freedland, K. E., Clouse, R. E., & Lustman, P. J. (2001) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.24.6.1069 · Cited by 3,926
Ali, S., Stone, M. A., Peters, J., Davies, M. J., & Khunti, K. (2006) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01943.x · Cited by 1,311
Self-citationEpidemiology of depression and diabetes: a systematic review
Roy, T., & Lloyd, C. E. (2012) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(12)70004-6 · Cited by 1,229
PRACTICAL STATISTICS FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH
Ludbrook, J. (1991) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.1991.tb00019.x · Cited by 1,219
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Modesti, 2016, ESH Working Group on CV Risk in Low Resource Settings. Panethnic differences in blood pressure in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis, PLoS One, 11
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–202 of 202
Psychological support for children with type 1 diabetes: a review
Simakova, M. A., Tlif, A. I., Kirakosyan, L. S., Shadrina, V. V., & Kondratyeva, E. (2026) · Archives of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery · doi:10.66825/2949-4664-apps-4-3-79-92
Perspective Chapter: Mental Health Integration in Primary Medical Care
Msheik, A., Al-Saad, N., Peralta, R. R., Mokdad, Z. A., Illeyyan, A., Mohamad, A. R. E., AlShurbaji, F., Ahmed, A., Maadhadi, M. A., Bauzá, P., et al. (2026) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1017502
Metadata
- Authors
- Farooqi, A., Gillies, C., Sathanapally, H., Abner, S., Seidu, S., Davies, M. J., Polonsky, W. H., & Khunti, K.
- Affiliations
- Birmingham City University (GB)
- University of Leicester (GB)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Farooqi, Aaisha
- ORCID
- Venue
- Primary Care Diabetes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 1751-9918 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3217806785
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 11
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Primary care diabetes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BCU Open Access Repository (Birmingham City University) (acceptedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Leeds Biomedical Research Centre
- National Institute for Health Research
- NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- depression, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, depression prevalence, mental health in diabetes, diabetes distress, specialist care, primary care, low- and middle-income countries, chronic disease management
- MeSH terms
- Chronic Disease, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Quality of Life, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review