Cited by 350Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchMental Health Treatment and Access

The prevalence of co‐morbid depression in adults with Type 1 diabetes: systematic literature review

Open access
Barnard, K. D., Skinner, T. C., Peveler, R.·2006·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

Aim To review the literature estimating the cross-sectional prevalence of clinical depression in adults with Type 1 diabetes. Methods Electronic databases and published references were used to identify studies published between January 2000 and June 2004, with a previous meta-analysis used to identify studies before 1 January 2000. Results Between January 2000 and June 2004, a further five eligible studies were identified. Only one was a controlled study using diagnostic interviewing to determine rates of depression. Taking all of the eligible studies identified by the previous meta-analysis and this search, the prevalence of clinical depression in controlled studies was 12.0% for people with diabetes compared with 3.2% for control subjects. In studies with no control group, the prevalence of clinical depression was 13.4%. Conclusion There are wide-ranging differences reported in the various studies on the prevalence of depression in Type 1 diabetes. In view of the differing methods of diagnosis and small participant numbers, the results should be viewed with caution. A controlled study using diagnostic interviewing techniques to determine levels of depression is recommended to provide a clearer picture of both the prevalence and characteristics of that depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01814.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnard, K. D., Skinner, T. C., & Peveler, R.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Skinner, T. C.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03-24
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
445-448
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W2056196922
Cited by
350
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 30
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression, type 1 diabetes, comorbidities, prevalence, adults, major depressive disorder, diagnostic interviewing
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Male, Prevalence, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review