CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 204Diabetes Management and EducationMental Health Treatment and AccessDiabetes Management and Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the prevalence of depression between people with and without Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes

Open access
Farooqi, Aaisha, Gillies, Clare, Sathanapally, Harini, Abner, Sophia, Seidu, Sam, Davies, Melanie J., Polonsky, William H., Khunti, Kamlesh·2022·Primary Care Diabetes
DOI 10.1016/j.pcd.2021.11.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Aims Diabetes can significantly impact quality of life and mental health. However, inconsistencies have been reported in the prevalence of depression in those with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, and those without. Systematic reviews also included studies without adequate control subjects. We update existing literature, by comparing depression prevalence between individuals with and without Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes.Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and PSYCHINFO, from January 1985 to August 2021. Studies were excluded if they failed to have an adequate control group, specified type of diabetes, or reported depression prevalence by type of diabetes.Results 44 studies were selected for inclusion. The prevalence of depression was significantly higher in people with Type 1 (22% vs 13%, OR = 2.10 (95% CI: 1.23, 3.52)), or Type 2 diabetes (19% vs 11%, OR = 1.76 (1.55, 2.01)) compared to those without diabetes. There was no association between study effect size and mean age or gender. Findings did not significantly differ between methods of depression assessment. Prevalence of depression in people with diabetes was higher in studies carried out in specialist care (36%, OR = 3.14 (2.12, 4.63)) compared to those in community or primary care (12%, OR = 1.51 (1.35, 1.70) and in low- and middle-income countries (OR = 2.58 (1.91, 3.50) compared to countries with high income economies (OR = 1.59 (1.39, 1.82)).Conclusions Depression prevalence remains significant in those with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Effective chronic disease management in people with diabetes is important, particularly screening and managing depression and diabetes distress in specialist care settings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pcd.2021.11.001

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 65 references

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Modesti, 2016, ESH Working Group on CV Risk in Low Resource Settings. Panethnic differences in blood pressure in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis, PLoS One, 11

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Farooqi, A., Gillies, C., Sathanapally, H., Abner, S., Seidu, S., Davies, M. J., Polonsky, W. H., & Khunti, K.
Affiliations
  • Birmingham City University (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Farooqi, Aaisha
ORCID
Venue
Primary Care Diabetes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
1751-9918 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.pcd.2021.11.001
OpenAlex
W3217806785
Cited by
204
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 11
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Primary care diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BCU Open Access Repository (Birmingham City University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Leeds Biomedical Research Centre
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
depression, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, depression prevalence, mental health in diabetes, diabetes distress, specialist care, primary care, low- and middle-income countries, chronic disease management
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Quality of Life, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review