Cited by 234Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareSocial Media in Health Education

An investigation into the empowerment effects of using online support groups and how this affects health professional/patient communication

Open access
Bartlett, Yvonne Kiera, Coulson, Neil S.·2011·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective The current research investigates the potential of online support groups (OSGs) to foster empowerment and how membership might affect the patient/health professional relationship.Methods 246 participants across 33 OSGs completed an online questionnaire.Results All empowerment processes and outcomes identified by van Uden-Kraan et al. [1] were found to be present. All empowerment outcomes were adequately predicted by empowerment processes. The majority (82.2%) of participants had discussed information found online with their health professional and most (74.2%) were satisfied with the response. Around 60% of participants felt membership of an OSG had affected the relationship with their health professional and from qualitative responses the effects were mostly positive.Conclusion OSGs have the potential to produce empowerment outcomes for those who choose to use them. Furthermore, users report a positive reaction to information found online from their health professionals.Practice implications Although not all patients will benefit from using OSGs, health professionals suggesting their use could ensure that they reach the maximum receptive audience. Furthermore, this research could be used to encourage a more 'net friendly' attitude amongst health professionals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.029

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bartlett, Y. K., & Coulson, N. S.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Bartlett, Yvonne Kiera
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
83
Issue
1
Pages
113-119
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085922052
Cited by
234
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
FWCI
18.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
Keywords
online support groups, patient empowerment, health professional-patient communication, patient-professional relationship, online health information, patient satisfaction, empowerment process
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, Communication, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Participation, Power, Psychological, Professional-Patient Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Help Groups, Social Support, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review