Cited by 35Diabetes Management and EducationTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Telehealth delivery of motivational interviewing for diabetes management: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Open access
McDaniel, Cassidi C., Kavookjian, Jan, Whitley, Heather P.·2022·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objectives The objective of this systematic review was to explore and report the evidence and gaps in the literature for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying the effects of motivational interviewing (MI)-based telehealth interventions on outcomes among persons with diabetes (PWD) or prediabetes. Methods Following a modified Cochrane approach, we searched Pubmed, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Clinicaltrials.gov. Included studies were RCTs published in English before March 25, 2021 evaluating MI-based telehealth on outcomes for adults with diabetes or prediabetes. Results A total of 21 retained articles captured results for 6436 PWD. Among the most commonly investigated outcomes, 60% of articles documented A1C reductions (ranging from<1% to>3%), 56% documented systolic blood pressure reductions, 57% documented diabetes self-efficacy/empowerment improvements, and 40% documented physical activity improvements. Conversely, diastolic blood pressure, lipid panels, body mass index, depressive symptoms, and quality of life were frequently measured outcomes, where MI-based telehealth yielded minor effects (<30% of articles demonstrating improvements). Conclusions MI-based telehealth seems most effective for improving A1C, systolic blood pressure, diabetes self-efficacy, and physical activity behaviors. Variability in outcome assessment and intervention heterogeneity were key challenges impeding comparisons across retained articles. Practice implications MI-based telehealth interventions demonstrate promising results for improving outcomes in PWD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.036

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [3]Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group, Lancet. 352 (1998) 837– 53. 9742976
  2. [13]Rollnick SR, Miller WR, Butler CC, Motivational interviewing in health care, The Guilford Press, New York, 2008.
  3. [23]Powers MA, Bardsley JK, Cypress M, Funnell MM, Harms D, Hess-Fischl A, Hooks B, Isaacs D, Mandel ED, Maryniuk MD, Norton A, Rinker J, Siminerio LM, Uelmen S, Diabetes Self-management Education and Support in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Report of the American Diabetes Association, the Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of PAs, the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, and the American Pharmacists Association, Diabetes Care. 43 (2020) 1636– 49. DOI: 10.2337/dci20-0023. 32513817 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [25]Dwinger S, Dirmaier J, Herbarth L, Konig HH, Eckardt M, Kriston L, Bermejo I, Harter M, Telephone-based health coaching for chronically ill patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, Trials. 14 (2013) 337. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-337. 24135027 PMC4016132 · DOI
  5. [31]Kozma CM, Reeder CE, Schulz RM, Economic, clinical, and humanistic outcomes: a planning model for pharmacoeconomic research, Clin Ther. 15 (1993) 1121– 32; discussion 20. 8111809
  6. [32]Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA, The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials, Brit Med J. 343 (2011) d5928. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d5928. 22008217 PMC3196245 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [46]Fischer HH, Eisert SL, Everhart RM, Durfee MJ, Moore SL, Soria S, Stell DI, Rice-Peterson C, MacKenzie TD, Estacio RO, Nurse-run, telephone-based outreach to improve lipids in people with diabetes, American journal of managed care. 18 (2012) 77– 84. 22435835

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDaniel, C. C., Kavookjian, J., & Whitley, H. P.
Affiliations
Auburn University (US)
Corresponding author
McDaniel, Cassidi C.
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
105
Issue
4
Pages
805-820
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3183802659
Cited by
35
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (TL1TR003106)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
motivational interviewing, telemedicine, diabetes management, prediabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, blood pressure, diabetes self-efficacy, physical activity, behavioral interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Prediabetic State, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Telemedicine, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review