Cited by 138Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDiabetes Management and EducationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Telehealth for diabetes self-management in primary healthcare: A systematic review and meta-analysis

So, Chi F, Chung, Joanne WY·2018·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus is prevalent worldwide and the majority of the patients with this metabolic disease are managed in primary healthcare settings. Self-management is, therefore, crucial for the health and wellbeing of people with diabetes. Due to the advancement of information technologies, telehealth intervention as self-management measures potentially offer a possible solution in the primary healthcare arena to cope with the increasing demand for diabetes control. Methods: This study aims to systematically review the effectiveness of telehealth on diabetes control self-management in primary healthcare settings. A keyword search was conducted in six databases for randomised controlled trials. Data extraction and quality assessment of the reviewed studies were done with standardised forms and checklists. A meta-analysis was also performed in this review. Results: Of the seven studies included in this review, all of them reported a decreasing level of glycated haemoglobin. Four studies examined the effect of telehealth interventions on fasting plasma glucose levels; however, the overall effects were insignificant. It is, nonetheless, encouraging to see two studies which investigated their effect on two-hour post-meal glucose levels, and showed positive effects for glycaemic control self-management in the short term. This finding, though only from two studies, points to a promising future of utilising telehealth interventions in controlling this metabolic disease in the primary healthcare arena. Conclusions: This review showed positive effects of telehealth interventions for diabetes control self-management at the primary healthcare stage. Further studies are required to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of telehealth interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1357633x17700552

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
So, C. F., & Chung, J. W.
Affiliations
Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
So, Chi F
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2017-05-02
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
356-364
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2610170202
Cited by
138
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
telemedicine, diabetes self-management, HbA1c, glycemic control, fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, primary care, diabetes mellitus, remote patient monitoring
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Diabetes Mellitus, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Primary Health Care, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review