Cited by 53Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesGeological and Geophysical StudiesGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods

A Bayesian iterative geomagnetic model with universal data input: Self-consistent spherical harmonic evolution for the geomagnetic field over the last 4000 years

Arneitz, Patrick, Egli, Ramon, Leonhardt, Roman, Fabian, Karl·2019·Physics of The Earth and Planetary Interiors

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pepi.2019.03.008

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arneitz, P., Egli, R., Leonhardt, R., & Fabian, K.
Affiliations
  • Central Institution for Meteorology and Geodynamics (AT)
  • Geological Survey of Norway (NO)
Corresponding author
Arneitz, Patrick
Venue
Physics of The Earth and Planetary Interiors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
290
Pages
57-75
ISSN
0031-9201 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2929055738
Cited by
53
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physics of The Earth and Planetary Interiors (publishedVersion)
Funders
FWF (P24722)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Keywords
geomagnetic field, Bayesian inversion, spherical harmonic model, historical magnetic observations, secular variation, dipole moment, non-dipole field, data uncertainty, error correlation, geomagnetic field evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review