The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The global status of insect resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides
Open accessAbstract
The first neonicotinoid insecticide, imidacloprid, was launched in 1991. Today this class of insecticides comprises at least seven major compounds with a market share of more than 25% of total global insecticide sales. Neonicotinoid insecticides are highly selective agonists of insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and provide farmers with invaluable, highly effective tools against some of the world's most destructive crop pests. These include sucking pests such as aphids, whiteflies, and planthoppers, and also some coleopteran, dipteran and lepidopteran species. Although many insect species are still successfully controlled by neonicotinoids, their popularity has imposed a mounting selection pressure for resistance, and in several species resistance has now reached levels that compromise the efficacy of these insecticides. Research to understand the molecular basis of neonicotinoid resistance has revealed both target-site and metabolic mechanisms conferring resistance. For target-site resistance, field-evolved mutations have only been characterized in two aphid species. Metabolic resistance appears much more common, with the enhanced expression of one or more cytochrome P450s frequently reported in resistant strains. Despite the current scale of resistance, neonicotinoids remain a major component of many pest control programmes, and resistance management strategies, based on mode of action rotation, are of crucial importance in preventing resistance becoming more widespread. In this review we summarize the current status of neonicotinoid resistance, the biochemical and molecular mechanisms involved, and the implications for resistance management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Overview of the Status and Global Strategy for Neonicotinoids
Jeschke, P., Nauen, R., Schindler, M., & Elbert, A. (2011) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf101303g · Cited by 1,867
Self-citation
Cited by
The evolutionary origins of pesticide resistance
Hawkins, N. J., Bass, C., Dixon, A., & Neve, P. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12440 · Cited by 836
Self-citationNeonicotinoids in U.S. maize: Insecticide substitution effects and environmental risk
Perry, E. D., & Moschini, G. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102320 · Cited by 34
Papiernik, S. K., Sappington, T. W., Luttrell, R. G., Hesler, L. S., & Allen, K. C. (2018) · Journal of Integrated Pest Management · doi:10.1093/jipm/pmx026 · Cited by 21
Toxicity of imidacloprid for nontarget arthropods in a laboratory experiment
Faly, L. I., Orzekauskaite, A., Paulauskas, A., & Brygadyrenko, V. V. (2025) · Biosystems Diversity · doi:10.15421/012560 · Cited by 3
Fate and effects of flupyradifurone and sulfoxaflor on non-target soil-dwelling invertebrates
Hsiung, C., Boyd, P., Lemieux, H., Maisonneuve, F., Scroggins, R., & Princz, J. (2026) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1093/etojnl/vgag053 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Bass, C., Denholm, I., Williamson, M. S., & Nauen, R.
- Venue
- Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 121
- Pages
- 78-87
- ISSN
- 0048-3575 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992909979
- Cited by
- 1,212
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The global status of insect resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pestbp.2015.04.004
- The paper
- Bass, C., Denholm, I., Williamson, M. S., & Nauen, R. (2015). The global status of insect resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2015.04.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.