Cited by 55Coffee research and impactsSleep and Work-Related FatigueHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

Effect of chronic caffeine intake on choice reaction time, mood, and visual vigilance

Judelson, Daniel A., Armstrong, Lawrence E., Sökmen, Bülent, Roti, Melissa W., Casa, Douglas J., Kellogg, Mark D.·2005·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

The stimulatory effects of acute caffeine intake on choice reaction time, mood state, and visual vigilance are well established. Little research exists, however, on the effects of chronic caffeine ingestion on psychomotor tasks. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of 5 days of controlled caffeine intake on cognitive and psychomotor performance. Three groups of 20 healthy males (age=22+/-3 years, mass=75.4+/-7.9 kg, body fat percentage=11.2+/-5.1%) twice completed a battery of cognitive and psychomotor tasks: after 6 days of 3 mg.kg(-1) day(-1) caffeine equilibration (Day 6), and after 5 days of experimental (0 [G0], 3 [G3], or 6 [G6] mg.kg(-1) day(-1)) caffeine intake (Day 11). Groups were randomized and stratified for age, mass, and body composition; all procedures were double-blind. Cognitive analyses involved a visual four-choice reaction time test, a mood state questionnaire, and a visual vigilance task. Experimental chronic caffeine intake did not significantly alter the number of correct responses or the mean latency of response for either the four-choice reaction time or the visual vigilance tasks. The Vigor-Activity subset of the mood state questionnaire was significantly greater in G3 than G0 or G6 on Day 11. All other mood constructs were unaffected by caffeine intake. In conclusion, few cognitive and psychomotor differences existed after 5 days of controlled caffeine ingestion between subjects consuming 0, 3, or 6 mg.kg(-1) day(-1) of caffeine, suggesting that chronic caffeine intake (1) has few perceptible effects on cognitive and psychomotor well-being and (2) may lead to a tolerance to some aspects of caffeine's acute effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.06.011

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies that have employed long-term caffeine withdrawal methodology have consistently failed to find cognitive enhancing effects of acute caffeine.

    “In fact, studies that have employed long-term caffeine withdrawal methodology have consistently failed to find cognitive enhancing effects of acute caffeine (78–82).”

    From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [80]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Judelson, D. A., Armstrong, L. E., Sökmen, B., Roti, M. W., Casa, D. J., & Kellogg, M. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Judelson, Daniel A.
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-08
Volume
85
Issue
5
Pages
629-634
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049106374
Cited by
55
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
caffeine tolerance, choice reaction time, visual vigilance, mood states, psychomotor performance, cognitive performance, caffeine dose-response, healthy men
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Attention, Caffeine, Choice Behavior, Cognition, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reaction Time, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review