Cited by 47Veterinary Equine Medical ResearchGut microbiota and healthRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology

Changes of the hindgut microbiota due to high-starch diet can be associated with behavioral stress response in horses

Destrez, Alexandra, Grimm, Pauline, Cézilly, Frank, Julliand, Véronique·2015·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

The digestive system of horses is adapted to a high-fiber diet consumed in small amounts over a long time. However, during training, high-starch and low-fiber diets are usually fed which may induce hindgut microbial disturbances and intestinal pain. These diets can be described as alimentary stress. The aim of the present study was to investigate to what extent changes in behavior are associated with alimentary stress and microbial composition changes of the cecal or colonic ecosystem. Six fistulated horses were used. The alimentary stress was a modification of diet from a high-fiber diet (100% hay) to a progressive low-fiber and high-starch diet (from 90% hay and 10% barley to 57% hay and 43% barley in 5 days). Cecal and colonic total anaerobic, cellulolytic, amylolytic and lactate-utilizing bacteria were enumerated three times (twice on high-fiber diet and once on 57% hay and 43% barley diet). The behavior of horses was assessed from continuous video recording over an 18-h time period. In addition two personality traits were measured: neophobia (assessed from the reaction to the presence of a novel object placed near a feeder in a test arena) and sociability (assessed from the reaction to an unfamiliar horse in a stall). Video recordings were analyzed by scan sampling every 10 min using the following behavioral categories: lying, resting, feeding and being vigilant. In addition, we recorded time spent feeding and time spent in vigilance during the neophobia test, and time spent in vigilance and time spent in interactions with the unfamiliar horse during the sociability test. The alimentary stress induced significant increases of colonic total anaerobic bacteria, lactate-utilizing bacteria and amylolytic bacteria concentrations. When horses were fed the 57% hay–43% barley diet, time spent in vigilance tended to be positively correlated with cecal and colonic amylolytic bacteria concentrations during the sociability test and with cecal lactate-utilizing and colonic amylolytic bacteria concentrations during the neophobia test. These correlations suggested that dietary-induced modulation of the microbiota may affect horse behavior and that behavioral cues may be used as non-invasive indicators of alimentary stress. It might prove useful to prevent intestinal pain of horses on farms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.039

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In horses, a high-starch (HB) diet increased the concentration of total anaerobic, amylolytic and lactate-utilizing bacteria in the colon relative to a high-fiber (HF) diet, with no difference in the cecum and no difference in cellulolytic bacteria in the colon.

    “↑ Concentration of total anaerobic, | amylolytic and lactate-utilizing | bacteria in colon after HB diet (no | difference in cecum); cellulolytic | bacteria not different in colon”
  • In ponies, a high-starch diet was associated with more reactive and less settled behavior (more pace changes, less time standing and less time investigating surroundings) than a high-fiber diet.

    “Ponies are more reactive and | less settled on high-starch | diet (↑ number of times pace | was changed, less time | standing and less time | investigating surroundings, | ponies were more tense, | nervous, unsure)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Destrez, A., Grimm, P., Cézilly, F., & Julliand, V.
Affiliations
  • Institut Agro Dijon (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Destrez, Alexandra
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
149
Pages
159-164
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W597891614
Cited by
47
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Equine › Veterinary Equine Medical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Keywords
high-starch diet, hindgut microbiota, horses, cecal bacteria, colonic bacteria, amylolytic bacteria, lactate-utilizing bacteria, anaerobic bacteria, neophobia, sociability, vigilance behavior, horse personality, intestinal pain
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Blood Cell Count, Castration, Cecum, Diet, Dietary Carbohydrates, Exploratory Behavior, Feeding Behavior, Horses, Intestinal Fistula, Longitudinal Studies, Social Behavior, Starch, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review