Cited by 42Veterinary Equine Medical ResearchGut microbiota and healthRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology

Dietary-induced modulation of the hindgut microbiota is related to behavioral responses during stressful events in horses

Open access
Destrez, Alexandra, Grimm, Pauline, Julliand, Véronique·2019·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

The bidirectional communication between the central and the enteric nervous system named the gut-brain axis has been widely recognized. The gut microbiota has been implicated in a variety of stress-related conditions including anxiety, depression and irritable bowel syndrome based on rodent studies or correlative analysis in human patients. The aim of the present study was to investigate to what extent changes in behavior during stressful events and in the microbial composition of the colonic ecosystem were associated in horses. The microbiota alterations were induced by a change from a high-fiber diet (100% hay, H diet) to a progressive low-fiber and high-starch diet (56% hay and 44% barley, HB diet) on six fistulated horses. Colonic total anaerobic, cellulolytic, amylolytic and lactate-utilizing bacteria were enumerated once on H diet and once on HB diet. Bacterial richness, diversity and structure at family and genus level were also determined. The behavior of horses was assessed through two standardized stressful tests: a novelty test and an umbrella test. The different alterations measured in the colonic microbiota demonstrated a lower fibrolytic capacity and a higher amylolytic capacity of the ecosystem when horses received HB compared to H diet. During the novelty test, the frequency of blowing was significantly higher in HB than in H diet and was positively correlated with the concentration of amylolytic bacteria and the Succinivibrionaceae relative abundance. During the umbrella test, behavioral variables were not significantly different between the diets but the colonic content pH was negatively correlated with the frequency of startle response. Behavioral responses of anxiety were related to hindgut microbiota indicators of a high-starch diet. Dietary-induced modulation of the gut microbiota composition may have changed the horses' behavioral reactions in stressful situations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.02.003

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In horses, a high-starch diet increased the abundance of amylolytic and total anaerobic bacteria and of Succinivibrionaceae compared with a high-fiber diet.

    “↑ Concentration of amylolytic and total | anaerobic bacteria in HB diet; ↑ | abundance of Succinivibrionaceae in | HB diet”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Chesson, A., Forsberg, C. Polysaccharide degradation by rumen microorganisms. The rumen microbial ecosystem: Springer; 1997. p. 329-81.
  2. Stewart, C., Flint, H., Bryant, M. The rumen bacteria. The rumen microbial ecosystem: Springer; 1997. p. 10-72.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Destrez, A., Grimm, P., & Julliand, V.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Procédés Alimentaires et Microbiologiques (FR)
Corresponding author
Destrez, Alexandra
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
202
Pages
94-100
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2912316851
Cited by
42
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4
FWCI
10.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Equine › Veterinary Equine Medical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Keywords
gut microbiota, horses, dietary fiber, high-starch diet, colonic microbiota, gut-brain axis, stress response, anxiety-like behavior, amylolytic bacteria, fibrolytic bacteria, Succinivibrionaceae, colonic pH, startle response
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Animals, Colon, Diet, Horses, Male, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review