The DOI matches its Crossref record; 254 of the 254 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the network dynamics underlying brain activity during rest
Open accessAbstract
Since the mid 1990s, the intriguing dynamics of the brain at rest has been attracting a growing body of research in neuroscience. Neuroimaging studies have revealed distinct functional networks that slowly activate and deactivate, pointing to the existence of an underlying network dynamics emerging spontaneously during rest, with specific spatial, temporal and spectral characteristics. Several theoretical scenarios have been proposed and tested with the use of large-scale computational models of coupled brain areas. However, a mechanistic explanation that encompasses all the phenomena observed in the brain during rest is still to come. In this review, we provide an overview of the key findings of resting-state activity covering a range of neuroimaging modalities including fMRI, EEG and MEG. We describe how to best define and analyze anatomical and functional brain networks and how unbalancing these networks may lead to problems with mental health. Finally, we review existing large-scale models of resting-state dynamics in health and disease. An important common feature of resting-state models is that the emergence of resting-state functional networks is obtained when the model parameters are such that the system operates at the edge of a bifurcation. At this critical working point, the global network dynamics reveals correlation patterns that are spatially shaped by the underlying anatomical structure, leading to an optimal fit with the empirical BOLD functional connectivity. However, new insights coming from recent studies, including faster oscillatory dynamics and non-stationary functional connectivity, must be taken into account in future models to fully understand the network mechanisms leading to the resting-state activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Like other studies focused on measures of functional connectivity, our conclusions are tempered by questions about the origins and significance of correlated fluctuations in the blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) fMRI signal61-63.”
From Evolutionarily conserved prefrontal-amygdalar dysfunction in early-life anxiety (2014) · cites this paper as [62]
In the citing paper
“this conceptualization takes into account our increasing understanding of these whole brain networks as dynamic entities, with patterns of activity and connectivity (both within-network and with other networks) shifting as required by ever-changing situational demands (Cabral, Kringelbach, & Deco, 2014;Shine et al., 2016).”
From Mental Time Travel? A Neurocognitive Model of Event Simulation. (2020) · cites this paper as Cabral, Kringelbach, & Deco, 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., Mazoyer, B., & Joliot, M. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0978 · Cited by 16,319
Modularity and community structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601602103 · Cited by 12,256
A default mode of brain function
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190
Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations
Rubinov, M., & Sporns, O. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 · Cited by 11,522
Complex networks: structure and dynamics
BOCCALETTI, S., LATORA, V, MORENO, Y., CHAVEZ, M., & HWANG, D. (2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009 · Cited by 11,010
Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri
Biswal, B., Zerrin Yetkin, F., Haughton, V. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910340409 · Cited by 9,812
The Brain's Default Network: Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease
Buckner, R. L., Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.011 · Cited by 9,761
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
Risken, H. (1984) · Springer series in synergetics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61544-3 · Cited by 9,128
The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks
Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Corbetta, M., Van Essen, D. C., & Raichle, M. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0504136102 · Cited by 8,553
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Ghosh, 2008, Noise during rest enables the exploration of the brain's dynamic repertoire, PLoS Computational Biology, 4, e1000196, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000196 · DOI
- Milgram, 1967, Small-world problem, Psychology Today, 1, 61
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Berridge, K. C., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.018 · Cited by 1,730
“Recently, it has become clear that the brain is never truly resting, but rather spontaneously active and constantly switching between different resting state networks (Cabral et al., 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMichel, C. M., & Koenig, T. W. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.062 · Cited by 1,418
Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity
Breakspear, M. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4497 · Cited by 1,239
“Large-scale models currently find their most active use in providing candidate mechanisms for these dynamics 105,107 .”
BackgroundThe Kuramoto model in complex networks
Rodrigues, F. A., Peron, T., Ji, P., & Kurths, J. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2015.10.008 · Cited by 1,064
Nociception, pain, negative moods, and behavior selection
Baliki, M. N., & Apkarian, A. V. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.005 · Cited by 731
Metadata
- Authors
- Cabral, J., Kringelbach, M. L., & Deco, G.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Cabral, Joana
- Venue
- Progress in Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 114
- Pages
- 102-131
- ISSN
- 0301-0082 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973272857
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 254
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 14
- FWCI
- 3.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Progress in Neurobiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- ERC Advanced Grant DYSTRUCTURE (295129)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- resting-state brain activity, network dynamics, functional brain networks, bifurcation, criticality, EEG, MEG, functional MRI, oscillatory dynamics, mental health
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Humans, Neural Pathways, Rest, Nonlinear Dynamics, Neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
