Cited by 1,730Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Pleasure Systems in the Brain

Open access
Berridge, Kent C., Kringelbach, Morten L.·2015·Neuron

Abstract

Pleasure is mediated by well-developed mesocorticolimbic circuitry and serves adaptive functions. In affective disorders, anhedonia (lack of pleasure) or dysphoria (negative affect) can result from breakdowns of that hedonic system. Human neuroimaging studies indicate that surprisingly similar circuitry is activated by quite diverse pleasures, suggesting a common neural currency shared by all. Wanting for reward is generated by a large and distributed brain system. Liking, or pleasure itself, is generated by a smaller set of hedonic hot spots within limbic circuitry. Those hot spots also can be embedded in broader anatomical patterns of valence organization, such as in a keyboard pattern of nucleus accumbens generators for desire versus dread. In contrast, some of the best known textbook candidates for pleasure generators, including classic pleasure electrodes and the mesolimbic dopamine system, may not generate pleasure after all. These emerging insights into brain pleasure mechanisms may eventually facilitate better treatments for affective disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.018

Cites

204 of 204 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The modular/constitutive model holds that conscious sensations are generated by groups of neurons (modules) that can be small and localized elsewhere than the cortex.

    “The central premise of the model is that conscious sensations are generated by groups of neurons (the modules) that can be small in relative terms and localized elsewhere than the cortex.”

    From The function(s) of consciousness revisited: insights from a modular/constitutive model using vision as a test case (2026) · cites this paper as Berridge and Kringelbach (2015)

    The section “Causal hedonic hotspots for hedonic enhancements” describes small, localized sites outside the cortex that can amplify pleasure-related ‘liking’ reactions. But “Evolutionary origins of brain systems for hedonic reactions” distinguishes those reactions from conscious feelings, which may require additional neural mechanisms. The paper therefore does not establish the claimed model of how conscious sensations generally are generated. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The core of the vertebrate brain has elaborated a dizzying number of centers for affective (emotional) consciousness: the habenula, basal forebrain, periaqueductal gray, parts of the reticular formation and more.

    “As another illustration of extreme regional specialization, the core of the vertebrate brain has elaborated a dizzying number of centers for affective (emotional) consciousness: the habenula, basal forebrain, periaqueductal gray, parts of the reticular formation and more (Figure 3; Berridge and Kringelbach, 2015; Feinberg and Mallatt, 2016a; Hu, 2016; Feinberg and Mallatt, 2018a; Siciliano et al.,”

    From Phenomenal Consciousness and Emergence: Eliminating the Explanatory Gap (2020) · cites this paper as Berridge and Kringelbach, 2015

    The section “Causal hedonic hotspots for hedonic enhancements” (page unavailable) describes affect-related sites distributed from forebrain to brainstem, supporting the general point that multiple regions contribute to emotion-related processing. But it identifies different sites from those listed in the claim and discusses hedonic reactions, not a set of centers for affective consciousness. The paper also distinguishes objective hedonic reactions from subjective experience in “A neuroscience of pleasure” (page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Evidence for modular generation of sensations comes from sub-cortical hotspots responsible for pleasure (liking rather than wanting).

    “Evidence for this comes from the work of Berridge and Kringelbach (2015) on the sub-cortical hotspots responsible for sensations of pleasure (of liking rather than wanting)”
  • The insula mediates states of anger, aggression, and social emotion.

    “In addition, the insula has also been reported to mediate the states of anger, aggression, and social emotion [62,[67][68][69].”

    From The Insular Cortex: An Interface Between Sensation, Emotion and Cognition (2024) · cites this paper as [67]

    The sections on mapping pleasure discuss possible insula hedonic hotspots and correlations with pleasure ratings, but do not say that the insula mediates anger, aggression, or social emotion. Searches for those terms and related descriptions found no passage supporting the attributed claim; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The visual display could be constructed point-by-point by the action of separate modules, each acting as a hotspot.

    “The visual display could then be constructed point-by-point by the action of separate modules, each acting as a hotspot.”

    From The function(s) of consciousness revisited: insights from a modular/constitutive model using vision as a test case (2026) · cites this paper as Berridge and Kringelbach (2015)

    The section “Causal hedonic hotspots for hedonic enhancements” describes brain sites involved in pleasure and ‘liking,’ not modules constructing a visual display. Searches for point-by-point visual construction and visual hotspots found no passage addressing that claim; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Castro DC Berridge KC Optogenetic enhancement of food ‘liking’ versus ‘wanting’ in the ventral pallidum hotspot and lateral hypothalamus Society for Neuroscience Conference (San Diego) 2013
  2. Castro DC Chesterman NS Wu MKH Berridge KC Two cortical hedonic hotspots: orbitofrontal and insular sites of sucrose 'liking' enhancement Society for Neuroscience Conference (Washington, D.C.) 2014
  3. Kringelbach ML Berridge KC Pleasures of the Brain 2010 Oxford Oxford University Press
  4. Smith GP Morrison AM Fluharty SJ Dopamine and food reward Progress in Psychobiology and Physiological Psychology 1995 New York Academic Press 83 144
  5. Veldhuizen MG Rudenga KJ Small D Kringelbach ML Berridge KC The pleasure of taste flavor and food Pleasures of the brain 2010 Oxford, UK Oxford University Press 146 168

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berridge, K. C., & Kringelbach, M. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Berridge, Kent C.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
86
Issue
3
Pages
646-664
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1603857261
Cited by
1,730
References
204
Citations by year
2026: 146 · 2025: 193 · 2024: 166 · 2023: 155 · 2022: 164 · 2021: 189 · 2020: 133 · 2019: 213 · 2018: 130 · 2017: 108 · 2016: 88 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
14.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH063644, MH63644, R01MH063649)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA015188, R01DA015188)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
pleasure, mesocorticolimbic circuitry, anhedonia, dysphoria, reward, wanting, liking, nucleus accumbens, mesolimbic dopamine system, mood disorders, limbic system, valence
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Humans, Pleasure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review