Cited by 59COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutOccupational Health and Burnout

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in an intensive care unit (ICU): psychiatric symptoms in healthcare professionals

Open access
da Silva, Flaviane Cristine Troglio, Barbosa, Caio Parente·2021·Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Introduction During the COVID-19 pandemic period, the structure of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) activities changed fast. It was observed that the mental and physical health of the frontline workers reached levels of extreme clinical and psychological concern.Objective Understand the impact that COVID-19 is having on the front-line clinical team in the ICU environment, as well as reveal what proposals are being made to mitigate the clinical and psychological impacts that this group experiences.Method A systematic review was made following the PRISMA protocol (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis). We included any type of study on health workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, with results about their mental health. We were, therefore, interested in quantitative studies examining the prevalence of problems and effects of interventions, as well as qualitative studies examining experiences. We had no restrictions related to study design, methodological quality or language.Results Twenty-one studies reported on the urgent need for interventions to prevent or reduce mental health problems caused by COVID-19 among health professionals in ICU. Eleven studies demonstrated possibilities for interventions involving organizational adjustments in the ICU, particularly linked to emotional conflicts in the fight against COVID-19.Conclusion The disproportion between the need for technological supplies of intensive care medicine and their scarcity promotes, among many factors, high rates of psychological distress. Anxiety, irritability, insomnia, fear and anguish were observed during the pandemic, probably related to extremely high workloads and the lack of personal protective equipment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110299

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing literature states that professionals at higher risk of psychoemotional alteration are those working in highly complex areas such as emergencies or CCU, or on the front line with infectious-contagious patients.

    “the existing literature, which states that those professionals with a higher risk of suffering psychoemotional alteration are those who work in highly complex areas such as emergencies or CCU, or those who work on the front line with infectious-contagious patients (47, 48).”

    From Evolution of burnout syndrome in Spanish healthcare professionals during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: psychosocial variables involved (2025) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Results (page not provided) associate ICU teams with anxiety, depression and exhaustion, and the Discussion describes psychological risks for front-line healthcare workers. The paper does not establish that emergency or coronary-care-unit staff are at higher risk, so the claim's broader list of high-risk areas is not fully supported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
da Silva, F. C. T., & Barbosa, C. P.
Affiliations
Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (BR)
Venue
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
110
Pages
110299
ISSN
0278-5846 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3136993193
Cited by
59
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 8
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, intensive care unit, healthcare workers, psychiatric symptoms, mental health, psychological distress, anxiety, insomnia, irritability, fear, work overload, personal protective equipment shortage, organizational interventions
MeSH terms
Occupational Stress, COVID-19, Mental Disorders, Health Personnel, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Occupational Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review