Cited by 52Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisGeological and Geochemical Analysis

Constraints on the late Ediacaran sulfur cycle from carbonate associated sulfate

Open access
Tostevin, Rosalie, He, Tianchen, Turchyn, Alexandra V., Wood, Rachel A., Penny, Amelia M., Bowyer, Fred, Antler, Gilad, Shields, Graham A.·2017·Precambrian Research

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.precamres.2017.01.004

Cites

144 of 145 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Seawater sulphate δ34S values fell from a peak (~40-45‰) during the late Ediacaran to lower values by the early Cambrian.

    “demonstrating that seawater sulphate δ 34 S values fell from a peak (~40-45‰) during the late Ediacaran 19,20 to lower values by the early Cambrian.”

    From Possible links between extreme oxygen perturbations and the Cambrian radiation of animals (2019) · cites this paper as [19]

    Section 5.4.2 (page unavailable) says seawater sulfate δ³⁴S rose to ~40–45‰ before 547 Ma and describes terminal Ediacaran values as exceptionally high. The passages do not establish when values fell or specifically document lower values by the early Cambrian. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The CAS extraction protocol was established following tests involving twelve consecutive leaching steps on five carbonate samples from different stratigraphic horizons of the Aldan-Lena river sections and three samples from the Ediacaran Nama Group.

    “The protocol was established following tests involving twelve consecutive leaching steps on five carbonate samples from different stratigraphic horizons of the Aldan-Lena river sections and three samples from the Ediacaran Nama Group 19 .”

    From Possible links between extreme oxygen perturbations and the Cambrian radiation of animals (2019) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Methods section (page unavailable) describes a CAS extraction protocol using five NaCl pre-leaches, and the Results section reports pre-leach measurements for three Nama Group samples. Neither section describes twelve consecutive leaching steps or five samples from the Aldan-Lena river sections. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The range of the demosponge biomarker 24-isopropylcholestane is 713-635 Ma.

    “713-635 Ma, range of demosponge biomarker (24-isopropylcholestane) (123)”

    From Integrated records of environmental change and evolution challenge the Cambrian Explosion (2019) · cites this paper as [123]

    The Results and section 5.4.2 discuss carbonate-associated sulfate measurements and late Ediacaran age constraints, not the age range of a demosponge biomarker. Searches for 24-isopropylcholestane, 713 Ma, and 635 Ma found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed range. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [90]90. Morris, S.C., Mattes, B., Chen, M., 1990. The early skeletal organism Cloudina: new occurrences from Oman and possibly China. American Journal of Science 245-260.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tostevin, R., He, T., Turchyn, A. V., Wood, R. A., Penny, A. M., Bowyer, F., Antler, G., & Shields, G. A.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Tostevin, Rosalie
Venue
Precambrian Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
290
Pages
113-125
ISSN
0301-9268 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2569115079
Cited by
52
References
145
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Precambrian Research (publishedVersion)
  • Department of Earth Sciences EPrints Repository (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Apollo
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/I00596X/1, NE/P013643/1, NE/J017930/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Keywords
carbonate-associated sulfate, sulfur cycling, Ediacaran, Nama Group, sulfur isotopes, pyrite, seawater sulfate, sulfur isotope fractionation, redox conditions, Precambrian geochemistry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review